Re: how to troubleshoot a ups

2015-11-09 Thread ONeal, Miles
Ken, Why do you think the UPS is at fault? -Miles > On Nov 9, 2015, at 07:13, Ken Teh wrote: > > I need some advice on how to troubleshoot an apc smart ups. I am > getting pairs of onbatt/online messages from nut 3-4 times a day. No > particular regularity. > > My first attempt at a fix wa

Re: SNMP scanner?

2016-07-29 Thread ONeal, Miles
I don't recall the details but I thought this was covered in the map man page. I'm on a phone or I'd check right now. -Miles On Jul 29, 2016, at 20:06, ToddAndMargo mailto:toddandma...@zoho.com>> wrote: On 07/29/2016 05:21 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote: Openvas, nmap and so on 30.7.2016 2.15 ap.

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Tip: when your terminal gets all screwed up

2017-11-11 Thread ONeal, Miles
Or just “reset”. -Miles On Nov 11, 2017, at 08:33, Steven Haigh mailto:net...@crc.id.au>> wrote: On Sunday, 12 November 2017 1:30:45 AM AEDT Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 8:10 AM, Tom H mailto:tomh0...@gmail.com>> wrote: [ Hundreds of lines of fine-tuning prompt manipulatio

Re: [EXTERNAL] kernel/firmware update made computer inaccessible

2018-02-23 Thread ONeal, Miles
I would look into a new video driver. Which driver were you using? -Miles > On Feb 23, 2018, at 17:11, Steve Talbott wrote: > > Greetings, all -- > > Courtesy of an SL7 kernel and firmware update yesterday (yum details > below), I get an eternal black screen upon booting not only the new kern

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Your removal from the SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS list

2018-11-16 Thread ONeal, Miles
I got the same thing, I've just been too busy to look at it. On 11/16/2018 09:04 AM, Troy Dawson wrote: I got something similar. I was about to mark it as spam, and now that I see that someone else got the same thing, I'm definitely marking it as spam. I certainly hope that Fermilab's list-serve

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: kicked off the list via Office 365?

2018-11-27 Thread ONeal, Miles
Office365 has had all sorts of problems this month. On 11/27/2018 02:27 PM, Jon Brinkmann wrote: Yes, me too. After more than a decade of subscribership with no problems! I think FNAL's "filter" is way too sensitive: it cited bounced messages due to FNAL errors from three months ago as part of

Fwd: [EXTERNAL] Re: Planning for hypothetical RHEL/CentOS cancellation

2019-01-07 Thread ONeal, Miles
I fail to see how any of these are SL problems. You can use any of the filesystems you like. Which libraries and packages are provided and compatible with other software are a function of what Redhat provides, and as others have noted, the point of RHEL (upon which SL is based) is to provide a l

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Missing eth0 after upate to 7.7

2019-09-11 Thread ONeal, Miles
I have always tied MAC addresses to the EthX ports. One problem solved. -Miles On Sep 11, 2019, at 09:09, Steven C Timm mailto:t...@fnal.gov>> wrote: At Fermilab we have a lot of machines on which systemd/udev still falls through to the unpredictable ethX system of naming (#5 scheme in the ar

Re: Calibre current

2020-01-30 Thread ONeal, Miles
Andrew, On what do you base the following statement? | Yes it has a GUI user interface, but RHEL is becoming a server distro ... Thanks, Miles

Re: Red Hat on the Desktop - was Re: Calibre current

2020-01-30 Thread ONeal, Miles
That makes sense, and I agree. As far as I can tell, RH remains committed to the desktop (although more and more that means only GNOME). From: Andrew C Aitchison Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2020 16:05 To: SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@fnal.gov ; ONeal, Miles

Re: EL 8

2020-01-31 Thread ONeal, Miles
This is our issue as well -Miles > On Jan 31, 2020, at 07:43, Jean-Paul Chaput wrote: > > Caution: EXTERNAL email > > Hello There, > > > Just to supply another point of view, I'm sticking (i.e. the whole > network I manage) to SL7 (and CentOS8 afterward) because RHEL is the > only open so

Re: EL 8

2020-02-03 Thread ONeal, Miles
A fork is a point in time clone, after which the original and the fork do their own things (which may include the fork getting new/changed code from the original and/or vice versa). A fork is not a perpetual downstream dependency. Oracle claims OL is not a fork. If they are truly only providing

Re: EL 8

2020-02-03 Thread ONeal, Miles
I just know how it's supposed to work. I don't build the OS. From: Stephan Wiesand Sent: Monday, February 3, 2020 15:39 To: ONeal, Miles <0be99a30c213-dmarc-requ...@listserv.fnal.gov> Cc: SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@fnal.gov Subject: Re: EL 8 Ca

Re: Is Scientfic Linux Still Active as a Distribution?

2020-02-21 Thread ONeal, Miles
SL didn't have "support", but the mailing list provided excellent, real-world support. At least during the SL 3-5 timeframe, CentOS had nothing even close that I could find. There's obvious value in the broader community involvement that comes through CentOS, and in providing a free alternative

Re: Who Uses Scientific Linux, and How/Why?

2020-02-24 Thread ONeal, Miles
At my previous job, we used it for microprocessor development, along with commercial tools and the Torque/Moab batch queuing system. The software tools team used it as well. I used it on al our home computers for several years but eventually switched to Fedora to be able to use more recent deskt

Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] Why /tmp is bound in /tmp ? How can I remove this bound

2020-04-29 Thread ONeal, Miles
The mount points are set up that way so that filling up one of them doesn't keep the others from being written to. This helps protect from data loss. If the system is quiescent, you might be able to just unmount /tmp . If you need something copied from there, just remount it temporarily on a dir

Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] Why /tmp is bound in /tmp ? How can I remove this bound

2020-04-29 Thread ONeal, Miles
veats apply. How much space do you have on / ? (Run "df -hP /" to find out.) From: owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov on behalf of Francesco Alfano <0bdf64e162f4-dmarc-requ...@listserv.fnal.gov> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2020 1

Re: sl 6.10 server no longer sees other computers on network

2020-06-09 Thread ONeal, Miles
You checked the firewall? From: owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov on behalf of Larry Linder <0dea520dd180-dmarc-requ...@listserv.fnal.gov> Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2020 15:42 To: scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov Subject: sl 6.10 server no