I've got a new container build staged up :
https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/pull/6824
This will ship the full tzdata zone list. I will recommend bind
mounting the zoneinfo from the host to ensure all files are updated, but
this provides a suitable fallback.
Pat
On
I'll take a look.
I believe the initial plan was to pull zone info in via something
dynamic from the host, but I don't honestly remember...
Pat
On 10/18/19 5:02 AM, Duncan MacLeod wrote:
Hi all,
I think there's an issue with the sl:7 docker image (at least the one
that&#x
Hi all,
I think there's an issue with the sl:7 docker image (at least the one that's
available as of today, Oct 18 2019, digest included below), namely that tzdata
is quoted as installed, but the actual contents of that package aren't there.
This breaks functionality in python-
ll look into this.
> >
> > Pat
> >
> > On 6/10/19 9:59 AM, Phil Gold wrote:
> > > I've been having two problems with the newest docker packages in the
> > > sl-extras repository for Scientific Linux 7. I'm not sure where to
> > >
I've dropped a possible fix package in the sl-testing repo.
Can you try it to see if this resolves your issue?
On 6/10/19 1:05 PM, Pat Riehecky wrote:
I'll look into this.
Pat
On 6/10/19 9:59 AM, Phil Gold wrote:
I've been having two problems with the newest docker packages i
I'll look into this.
Pat
On 6/10/19 9:59 AM, Phil Gold wrote:
I've been having two problems with the newest docker packages in the
sl-extras repository for Scientific Linux 7. I'm not sure where to report
them so hopefully someone here will help.
The first problem appea
I've been having two problems with the newest docker packages in the
sl-extras repository for Scientific Linux 7. I'm not sure where to report
them so hopefully someone here will help.
The first problem appears to be one of packaging. The systemd unit file
for docker-1.13.1-96.gitb
We are using the one from docker-ce-stable on the main grid clusters at
Fermilab. All our jobs run inside these containers. Didn't know the sl-extra
ones even were out there.
Steve Timm
From: owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov
on beha
What is the difference between the docker packages in the sl-extras repository
and the ones from docker-ce-stable (as recommended by
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.docker.com_install_linux_docker-2Dce_centos_&d=DwIGaQ&c=gRgGjJ3BkIsb5y6s49QqsA&r=gd8BzeSQcySV
On Wed, 22 Nov 2017, Dan wrote:
On my SL7.4 laptop, I have docker-pr listening for https connections.
(Within docker, I have a locally-compiled copy of elabftw running an
electronic lab book service.)
When I point my web browser (Firefox) on the same machine to
https://localhost, I initially
Dear All,
On my SL7.4 laptop, I have docker-pr listening for https connections.
(Within docker, I have a locally-compiled copy of elabftw running an
electronic lab book service.)
When I point my web browser (Firefox) on the same machine to
https://localhost, I initially get a "Your conne
Hi
The problem is related to this line, that is added to
/usr/lib/systemd/system/docker.service in the new version. It was not in the
old version.
Requires=rhel-push-plugin.socket
In what package is the file provided ?
docker rpm should require that package.
--
Med Venlig Hilsen / Kind
On Fri, 21 Apr 2017, Pat Riehecky wrote:
On 04/21/2017 12:13 PM, Denice wrote:
However the corresponding container-selinux package
requires policycoreutils >= 2.5-11. That version of policycoreutils is
not yet published in the SL updates tree, but should appear soon - it
is in fastbugs, so
On 04/21/2017 12:13 PM, Denice wrote:
However the corresponding container-selinux package
requires policycoreutils >= 2.5-11. That version of policycoreutils is
not yet published in the SL updates tree, but should appear soon - it
is in fastbugs, so you would need to enable fastbugs to update it
On Thu, 20 Apr 2017, Mikkel Kruse Johnsen wrote:
Hi
After an update to "docker-1.12.6-11.el7.x86_64" the service is unable to
start.
# systemctl start docker.service
Failed to start docker.service: Unit not found.
disable/enable/stop is working.
I see that the ending is "sl7
I'm not seeing any errors on my boxes.
Pat
On 04/20/2017 02:12 AM, Mikkel Kruse Johnsen wrote:
Hi
After an update to "docker-1.12.6-11.el7.x86_64" the service is unable
to start.
# systemctl start docker.service
Failed to start docker.service: Unit not found.
disable
Hi
After an update to "docker-1.12.6-11.el7.x86_64" the service is unable
to start.
# systemctl start docker.service
Failed to start docker.service: Unit not found.
disable/enable/stop is working.
I see that the ending is "sl7" where the old package is "el7".
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 9:59 AM, wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2015, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> Of course errors can happen. I'd expect RH to fix them quickly because
>> it's in its interest for RHEL rebuilders to publish a distro as
>> similar to RHEL as possible.
>
> How so? Red Hat wants people to buy the
e.
It truly is that simple.
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 9:59 AM, wrote:
> Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
> Original Message
> From: Tom H
> Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2015 09:08
> To: SL Users
> Subject: Re: Docker
>
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Nico Kadel-Garc
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
Original Message
From: Tom H
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2015 09:08
To: SL Users
Subject: Re: Docker
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Tom H wrote:
>> 1) RH doesn't license RHE
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Tom H wrote:
>> 1) RH doesn't license RHEL; it provides subscriptions to RHEL. The
>> individual have licenses...
>
> I think you meant "individual components have licenses", It's cool.
Indeed, thanks.
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 8:08 PM, wrote:
>>
>> 1) RH doesn't license RHEL; it provides subscriptions to RHEL. The
>> individual have licenses...
>>
>> 2) What might be the rationale for RH to release SRPMs (as SRPMs
>> previously and as a git tree now) that are different from the SRPMs
>> from which
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Tom H wrote:
> 1) RH doesn't license RHEL; it provides subscriptions to RHEL. The
> individual have licenses...
I think you meant "individual components have licenses", It's cool.
> 2) What might be the rationale for RH to release SRPMs (as SRPMs
> previously an
ne for a few days.
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
Original Message
From: Tom H
Sent: Tuesday, February 3, 2015 12:18
To: SL Users
Subject: Re: Docker
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Yasha Karant wrote:
> On 02/02/2015 11:35 AM, Connie Sieh wrote:
>> On Fri, 30 Jan 2015, Yash
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Yasha Karant wrote:
> On 02/02/2015 11:35 AM, Connie Sieh wrote:
>> On Fri, 30 Jan 2015, Yasha Karant wrote:
>>>
>>> Presumably, any application that will run under CentOS, in particular,
>>> CentOS 7 that is the RHEL source release for other ports, such as SL 7,
>>
On 03/02/15 17:12, Yasha Karant wrote:
> To be clear, the legal language may be "license for fee", "subscription
> for fee", or "stand on your head for fee". The operative language is
> "FEE". The RHEL 7 binary executable and the RPM updates are not
> available from Red Hat (not CentOS, SL, etc.
2015 11:35 AM, Connie Sieh wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 30 Jan 2015, Yasha Karant wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 01/30/2015 10:32 AM, Brett Viren wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yasha Karant writes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
application that does not run under
Wine/CrossOver work under Docker under SL 7 the same as it would under
VirtualBox with a full install of say MS Win 8.1 (soon MS Win 10)?
Docker containers run on Linux (the kernel) so, no, if your application
requires honest-to-badness MicroSoft Windows don't pl
e, will a
>>>>> legally licensed MS Win application that does not run under
>>>>> Wine/CrossOver work under Docker under SL 7 the same as it would under
>>>>> VirtualBox with a full install of say MS Win 8.1 (soon MS Win 10)?
>>>> Docker co
SL6 container, until we get enough time to
>> > make it work on SL7 natively (after which we'll move it from container
>> > to base system)".
>> > Having nearly complete virtual host with sshd, postgresql server and
>> > related tools would be cumbersome
30 matches
Mail list logo
