On 21/06/14 11:09, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> Hi, Dag!!
>
> Haven't seen you since that London Linux conference, I'm back in the USA now.
>
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
>
>> Self-criticism (and yes, I feel part of Red Hat's community) is essential.
>> And a decision that
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 7:46 PM, Jamie Duncan wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Patrick J. LoPresti
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> >
>> > Just wanted to make a short note to say that source DVDs are available
>> > to RH customers.
>>
> If they're no
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Yasha Karant wrote:
> I have the following, possibly silly, question to post. As I understand it,
> access to the git repositories meets TUV linux/GPL requirements for release
> of the source. Nonetheless, the realities are that it is easier to build
> from the a
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 5:21 AM, Steven Haigh wrote:
> I have no doubt that something will come of it - watch this space. When
> it does happen, we all win.
Cool. We didn't have visibility into the git history of RHEL source
code before, so the visibility into the git history of CentOS as a the
On 11 Jun 2014, at 09:41, Steven Haigh wrote:
> On 11/06/14 17:24, Matthias Schroeder wrote:
>> On 06/11/2014 04:12 AM, Steven Haigh wrote:
>>> On 11/06/14 12:07, Paul Robert Marino wrote:
Yes a lot of us noticed.
Recompiling an entire distro from scratch is not an easy proposition.
>>>
On 11/06/14 18:42, Matt Lewandowsky wrote:
> The problem, as I see it, is that the "b...@centos.org" commits come from a
> magic place that no one is sure of where it is. The commits are not GPG
> signed, nor are they at all verifiable as originating with Red Hat.
>
> We're getting a bit off-top
(not to want to stray further off the topic)
but what does it matter if it doesn't come from Red Hat?
You can see the source and decide whether or not to use it in your
repository, just like the other bits that are added to SL that don't come
from the current SRPMs.
?
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 4:
Tom H, Sent: Wednesday, 11 June, 2014 01:33:
> AFAIC this pure FUD.
>
> In what way is the CentOS git less secure than other upstream git repos?
>
> Do you have an example of files being "dumped" into the CentOS git by
> non-CentOS uploaders? I've look at a few packages and I see
> kbsi...@karan.or
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 3:41 AM, Steven Haigh wrote:
> On 11/06/14 17:24, Matthias Schroeder wrote:
>> On 06/11/2014 04:12 AM, Steven Haigh wrote:
>>> On 11/06/14 12:07, Paul Robert Marino wrote:
Yes a lot of us noticed.
Recompiling an entire distro from scratch is not an easy propo
On 11/06/14 17:24, Matthias Schroeder wrote:
> On 06/11/2014 04:12 AM, Steven Haigh wrote:
>> On 11/06/14 12:07, Paul Robert Marino wrote:
>>> Yes a lot of us noticed.
>>> Recompiling an entire distro from scratch is not an easy proposition.
>>> Furthermore they need to strip out all of the Red Hat
On 06/11/2014 04:12 AM, Steven Haigh wrote:
On 11/06/14 12:07, Paul Robert Marino wrote:
Yes a lot of us noticed.
Recompiling an entire distro from scratch is not an easy proposition.
Furthermore they need to strip out all of the Red Hat branding. Expect
it to take a while at least a month or tw
-us...@listserv.fnal.gov
[mailto:owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov] On Behalf Of Stephen
John Smoogen
Sent: Tuesday, 10 June, 2014 23:31
To: owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov
Cc: scientific-linux-users@fnal.gov
Subject: Re: RHEL 7 just hit the market place, I'm lo
On 10 June 2014 20:12, Steven Haigh wrote:
> On 11/06/14 12:07, Paul Robert Marino wrote:
> > Yes a lot of us noticed.
> > Recompiling an entire distro from scratch is not an easy proposition.
> > Furthermore they need to strip out all of the Red Hat branding. Expect
> > it to take a while at lea
On 11/06/14 12:07, Paul Robert Marino wrote:
> Yes a lot of us noticed.
> Recompiling an entire distro from scratch is not an easy proposition.
> Furthermore they need to strip out all of the Red Hat branding. Expect
> it to take a while at least a month or two if not more.
I think it'll take long
14 matches
Mail list logo
