On 08/19/2012 09:03 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Todd And Margo Chester
toddandma...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/19/2012 05:56 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com
wrote:
By the time the print job gets
Hello,
I made some statistics and comparisons about security advisories
published by three popular RHEL 6 clones: CentOS 6, Oracle Linux 6 and
Scientific Linux 6.
The article is available at the following URL:
http://bitrate.epipe.com/rhel-vs-centos-scientific-oracle-linux-6_187
I hope you
After numerous searches on how to setup CentOS 6.3 and Win7 to dual
boot I turn to the readers of this forum for help...
I suppose my question is quite simple:
What is the correct way to set up a dual boot system for CentOS 6.3,
or SL 6.3, and Windows 7?
I have tried several times, with
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 07:02:47PM +0700, Janne Snabb wrote:
http://bitrate.epipe.com/rhel-vs-centos-scientific-oracle-linux-6_187
A few comments:
a) you forgot to include the SLC (CERN) distribution. This distribution
is most important when dealing with hardware vendors - most vendors
to myself in private. Do *not* send it to this mailing list unless your
message is specifically about Scientific Linux. Please do not start a
Firstly, I don't really like being told where I can and can't post. If the
discussion is off-topic, then so is the topic IMHO.
Anyway, I don't
On 20/08/2012 18:42, Ian Murray wrote:
I am not a member of the scientific community, so I am free to choose the distribution
that suits based on its merits. I do not use a clone as a bastion host for security
reasons. Otherwise I choose SL based on my perception of the robustness
On 20/08/12 14:02, Janne Snabb wrote:
Hello,
I made some statistics and comparisons about security advisories
published by three popular RHEL 6 clones: CentOS 6, Oracle Linux 6 and
Scientific Linux 6.
The article is available at the following URL:
What would be more interesting, from a statistical point of
view is to take those extremes out of the comparison.
A way to accomplish your objective is to calculate the
median value (i.e. the middle value after sorting by
delay), which is a good representation for the typical value.
-scott
On 08/20/2012 04:59 PM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
b) delays in issuing bug fixes are good for you - no delay means they
did not test the stuff before pushing it out.
FUD
- KB
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
ICQ: 2522219| Yahoo IM:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
On 08/20/2012 04:59 PM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
b) delays in issuing bug fixes are good for you - no delay means they
did not test the stuff before pushing it out.
FUD
- KB
It´s mistaken, in general, but
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Conan Doyle o...@celticblues.com wrote:
After numerous searches on how to setup CentOS 6.3 and Win7 to dual boot I
turn to the readers of this forum for help...
I suppose my question is quite simple:
What is the correct way to set up a dual boot system for
On 20/08/12 22:45, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 08/20/2012 04:59 PM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
b) delays in issuing bug fixes are good for you - no delay means they
did not test the stuff before pushing it out.
FUD
- KB
Lol. Karanbir, how are you able to release something derived from
On 08/20/2012 11:38 PM, Ian wrote:
b) delays in issuing bug fixes are good for you - no delay means they
did not test the stuff before pushing it out.
FUD
Lol. Karanbir, how are you able to release something derived from
Redhat, at the same time as Redhat (i.e. without a delay) and do
you are over simplifying the process. Eg. What was the time lag from
when the srpm was released and the rhn notes published to when CentOS
released that specific update ?
I seriously think this is the wrong place to discuss CentOS
specifically, don't you?
But, I'll humour you... if somehow,
On 08/21/2012 12:22 AM, Ian wrote:
I seriously think this is the wrong place to discuss CentOS
specifically, don't you?
I dont think this is about CentOS, its more about what the overall
impression being carried forward.
But, I'll humour you... if somehow, Delay= CloneReleaseTime -
On 20 August 2012 17:22, Ian murra...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
you are over simplifying the process. Eg. What was the time lag from
when the srpm was released and the rhn notes published to when CentOS
released that specific update ?
I seriously think this is the wrong place to discuss CentOS
While the graphs are nice, and provide a visual representation of the time it
takes to releasing a patch with regards to a security advisory - what real
information do they tell us?
Other than, some groups of 'volunteers' take longer to react to, and deliver
patches than others? While I
On 21/08/12 00:35, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 20 August 2012 17:22, Ian murra...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
you are over simplifying the process. Eg. What was the time lag from
when the srpm was released and the rhn notes published to when CentOS
released that specific update ?
I seriously think
I'll assume you meant this for the list..
On 21/08/12 00:54, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Ian murra...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
you are over simplifying the process. Eg. What was the time lag from
when the srpm was released and the rhn notes published to when CentOS
On 21/08/12 00:27, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 08/21/2012 12:22 AM, Ian wrote:
I seriously think this is the wrong place to discuss CentOS
specifically, don't you?
I dont think this is about CentOS, its more about what the overall
impression being carried forward is.
Me neither. Wires crossed
20 matches
Mail list logo
