it's better to use the images
ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6.3/x86_64/iso/SL-63-x86_64-2012-08-02-Everything-DVD1.iso
and
ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6.3/x86_64/iso/SL-63-x86_64-2012-08-02-Everything-DVD2.iso
so all softwares will be available locally on two
Hi All,
On several Windows machines lately, I have been using
Intel's Cherryville enterprise SSD drives. They work
very, very well.
Cherryville drives have a 1.2 million hour MTBF (mean time
between failure) and a 5 year warranty.
I have been thinking, for small business servers
with a low
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Todd And Margo Chester
toddandma...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
On several Windows machines lately, I have been using
Intel's Cherryville enterprise SSD drives. They work
very, very well.
Cherryville drives have a 1.2 million hour MTBF (mean time
between
On 2012/09/02 20:26, Nathan wrote:
In my experience, I've had more problems with hardware RAID controllers than any
other component (hardware OR software) except for traditional hard drives
themselves. We switched to software RAID (Linux) and ZFS (*BSD and Solaris)
years ago.
But that's
On 09/02/2012 08:26 PM, Nathan wrote:
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Todd And Margo Chester
toddandma...@gmail.com mailto:toddandma...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
On several Windows machines lately, I have been using
Intel's Cherryville enterprise SSD drives. They work
very,
Hmm. Never had a bad hardware RAID controller. Had several
mechanical hard drives go bad.
Anyone have an opinion(s) on SSD's in a small work group server?
We've had very good luck with SSDs (singly on workstations or spanned
volumes on servers) as primary storage mirroring to a spanned
