AMD edac_mce_amd kernel module question

2013-02-05 Thread Yasha Karant
SL 6x X86-64 on an AMD CPU. During boot, the dac_mce_amd kernel module is indicated as not being loaded. However, lsmod as well as a direct viewing of /proc/modules shows that the module is loaded and live. Evidence below. Is this consistent? Is the module actually active? kernel: 2.6.32-

Re: NFS write problem SL-6 -

2013-02-05 Thread Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
On 02/05/2013 02:05 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: I use some applications, e.g. Notecase and Tkremind, that save data to an nfs server on the LAN. This is a new SL-6.3 installation [Linux box7 2.6.3

Re: NFS write problem SL-6 -

2013-02-05 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: >I use some applications, e.g. Notecase and Tkremind, that save >data to an nfs server on the LAN. This is a new SL-6.3 >installation [Linux box7 2.6.32-279.19.1.el6.x86_64 XFCE]. It >can't wri

NFS write problem SL-6 -

2013-02-05 Thread Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
I use some applications, e.g. Notecase and Tkremind, that save data to an nfs server on the LAN. This is a new SL-6.3 installation [Linux box7 2.6.32-279.19.1.el6.x86_64 XFCE]. It can't write data to the servers. The F-18 box does, I can manipulate data on the se

Re: LAPACK for SL/CentOS/RHEL 5?

2013-02-05 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Mark Stodola wrote: > On 02/05/2013 11:51 AM, Alan McKay wrote: >> >> I see LAPACK 3.0 when I do "yum search", but the latest version is 3.4.2 >> >> Is there any place to get the newer RPMs for SL 5? >> >> I've looked into building it but the instructions assume a k

Re: LAPACK for SL/CentOS/RHEL 5?

2013-02-05 Thread Mark Stodola
On 02/05/2013 11:51 AM, Alan McKay wrote: I see LAPACK 3.0 when I do "yum search", but the latest version is 3.4.2 Is there any place to get the newer RPMs for SL 5? I've looked into building it but the instructions assume a knowledge of using the package. I'm just a lowly Sys Admin and want t

LAPACK for SL/CentOS/RHEL 5?

2013-02-05 Thread Alan McKay
I see LAPACK 3.0 when I do "yum search", but the latest version is 3.4.2 Is there any place to get the newer RPMs for SL 5? I've looked into building it but the instructions assume a knowledge of using the package. I'm just a lowly Sys Admin and want to build this for some scientists I support.

Re: Posted for testing: security packages for Java (SL5.0 - 5.8)

2013-02-05 Thread Pat Riehecky
Unfortunately, I do not know. Pat On 02/05/2013 11:13 AM, Robert Blair wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Are the open source versions subject to similar issues? I see the openjdk.org site has recent security updates but there don't seem to be corresponding updates to TUV rp

Re: Posted for testing: security packages for Java (SL5.0 - 5.8)

2013-02-05 Thread Robert Blair
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Are the open source versions subject to similar issues? I see the openjdk.org site has recent security updates but there don't seem to be corresponding updates to TUV rpm's. Thanks, Bob Blair On 02/05/2013 11:07 AM, Pat Riehecky wrote: > Security p

Posted for testing: security packages for Java (SL5.0 - 5.8)

2013-02-05 Thread Pat Riehecky
Security packages for Java posted for testing at ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/5rolling/testing/i386/ ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/5rolling/testing/x86_64/ Next week these packages will be officially released. This delay is to allow you time to test and verify

Re: lynx browser in SL6.3

2013-02-05 Thread =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stephen_Isard?=
Thanks for your replies. I know that there are entrenched views on termi nal colours, but I doubt that there are many fans of yellow text on a white background, which is how link urls come up with the default settings for terminals and lynx in SL6. Furthermore, I don't think that this arrangem en

Scientific Linux "SL 5.9" for x86_64 is officially released

2013-02-05 Thread Pat Riehecky
Scientific Linux "SL 5.9" for x86_64 Feb 5, 2013 Items marked with a "*" indicate changes since 5.8 See SL.documentation for Upstream vendor release notes. Send comments/issues/test reports to scientific-linux-us...@fnal.gov

Scientific Linux "SL 5.9" for i386 is officially released

2013-02-05 Thread Pat Riehecky
Scientific Linux "SL 5.9" for i386 Feb 5, 2013 Items marked with a "*" indicate changes since 5.8 See SL.documentation for Upstream vendor release notes. Send comments/issues/test reports to scientific-linux-us...@fnal.gov -

NFS error: rpc.nfsd: writing fd to kernel failed: errno 5 (Input/output error)

2013-02-05 Thread Carles Acosta
Dear all, I am new to the list, so, forgive me I am doing something wrong. I want to ask you about a strange issue on a SL6.2 server related to the NFS service. So, after a while working properly, we tried to restart NFS server one week ago and we obtained: Starting NFS services:

Re: lynx browser in SL6.3

2013-02-05 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:39 AM, zxq9 wrote: > On 02/05/2013 01:05 PM, Paul Robert Marino wrote: >>> >>> On Feb 4, 2013 3:18 PM, Stephen Isard <7p03xy...@sneakemail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Is anybody else out there trying to use lynx in SL6.3? When I bring it >>> up, the text for url links comes up as