Thought I'd already gotten that, I'll tend to it shortly.
Thanks for the feedback!
Pat
On 07/04/2014 08:10 PM, Bill Maidment wrote:
Pat
I'm getting the following error report at logon:
Last login: Fri Jul 4 23:36:13 EST 2014 on pts/0
ABRT has detected 1 problem(s). For more info run:
On 07/04/2014 10:54 AM, Yasha Karant wrote:
A practical question: will any alpha or beta SL 7 distro based
install be able to change into 7x production or will a full reinstall
be required?
I would strongly recommend a full reinstall from any Alpha/Beta before
going into production.
--
On 07/06/2014 07:05 AM, Semi wrote:
Useful package *xfig* is absent.
Looks like upstream has removed it. You could request it for EPEL.
On 04/07/2014 00:17, Pat Riehecky wrote:
Users interested in Scientific Linux 7 ALPHA can review:
One of the advantages of SL is that it includes packages that are not part
of the upstream but are useful in scientfic environments. Xfig, IMHO, is
one of those packages; if SL can include it, it will save me some hassle.
Steve Gaarder
System Administrator, Dept of Mathematics
Cornell
That's not right...
Looks like we need an upstream bug for that.
Pat
On 07/04/2014 10:35 PM, Bill Maidment wrote:
The actual error was caused by python-ethtool not being installed, so firstboot
crashed.
-Original message-
From:Bill Maidment b...@maidment.com.au
Sent: Saturday
On Fri, 4 Jul 2014, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Pat Riehecky riehe...@fnal.gov wrote:
Users interested in Scientific Linux 7 ALPHA can review:
http://listserv.fnal.gov/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind1407L=scientific-linux-develT=0X=30246605F08F0DC7EDP=74
--
Pat Riehecky
On Fri, 4 Jul 2014, Yasha Karant wrote:
As has been made clear, no conspiracy in terms of getting the matter
ported -- simply a possibly different set of impediments to building
from source. (Anyone checked if the Oracle EL7 port is done yet? What
about the Princeton port?) The conspiracy
Hi all,
CentOS 7 (final) has been released today. See :
https://www.centos.org/
It took 27 days to release it after the release oh RHEL 7. It is much
better than the release of CentOS 6 (242 days, or 8 months, after the
release of RHEL 6).
No SIG for SL mentionned in the release notes.
Hi.
The iso in
http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/7rolling/x86_64/iso/
This is 6.2 Gb, is this right?
Arturo
On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 15:05 +, Niels Walet wrote:
I am trying to chase this up with wolfram, but have the feeling this
may be a graphics issue: Anyone seen anything like this before?
I have no problems with Mathematica 9.0.1 running on SL 6.5 with the
latest packages and a Radeon HD 6450.
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014, Arturo Fatturi wrote:
Hi.
The iso in
http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/7rolling/x86_64/iso/
This is 6.2 Gb, is this right?
Yes. To burn to a DVD you will need a Dual Layer DVD .
Arturo
-Connie Sieh
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 03:29:45PM -0500, Connie Sieh wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014, Arturo Fatturi wrote:
Hi.
The iso in
http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/7rolling/x86_64/iso/
This is 6.2 Gb, is this right?
Yes. To burn to a DVD you will need a Dual Layer DVD .
What
CentOS-7.0-1406-x86_64-DVD
06-Jul-2014 17:33 4148166656
4 148 166 656 bytes should fit on one single layer DVD, as a
DVD+R Single Layer 4,700,372,992 bytes
DVD-R Single Layer 4,707,319,808 bytes
Presumably, the production version of SL 7 should be approximately the same
size.
I
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 03:29:45PM -0500, Connie Sieh wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014, Arturo Fatturi wrote:
Hi.
The iso in
http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/7rolling/x86_64/iso/
This is 6.2 Gb, is this right?
Yes. To burn to a DVD
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014, Yasha Karant wrote:
CentOS-7.0-1406-x86_64-DVD
06-Jul-2014 17:33 4148166656
4 148 166 656 bytes should fit on one single layer DVD, as a
DVD+R Single Layer 4,700,372,992 bytes
DVD-R Single Layer 4,707,319,808 bytes
Presumably, the production version of SL 7
A question: Will the point releases of SL7 be supported long term separatly
as it was on SL6 (unlike on CentOS) ?
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 04:52:22PM -0500, Connie Sieh wrote:
The iso in
http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/7rolling/x86_64/iso/
Yes. To burn to a DVD you will need a Dual Layer DVD .
USB installer or bust!
Go for it.
Just checked, the CentOS 7 ISO image explictely
I think this may be an SL issue as python-ethtool installed OK with RHEL7rc.
I'll try a fresh install of SL7alpha to see if it is reproducible.
-Original message-
From:Pat Riehecky riehe...@fnal.gov
Sent: Tuesday 8th July 2014 1:36
To: Bill Maidment b...@maidment.com.au;
One thing noticed missing on testing...
docker package is missing from SL7. Just downloaded and installed Centos 7,
and it has it (via yum).
Checking into a little more, it's in the extras repo (default enabled with
Centos). Could not find an extras repo on SL7 (no yum config to add it, or
Yes. It is reproducible.
The major difference between the RHEL7rc install and the SL7alpha install is
that RHEL7rc was bare-metal and SL7alpha was a KVM guest under SL6.5 host.
-Original message-
From:Bill Maidment b...@maidment.com.au
Sent: Tuesday 8th July 2014 10:51
To: Pat
20 matches
Mail list logo
