If a group of people want it, you could also maintain it as an EPEL
package...
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 11:15 AM Miles O'Neal wrote:
> What happened to the SL contrib directories?
>
>
> On 09/03/2015 10:13 AM, prmari...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Well it comes down to server vs desktop.
> Keep in mind
Can you get to the brightness settings? I've seen it before on a laptop
where they get turned almost all the way down.
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 8:00 AM Markus Neteler
wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 4:15 AM, Scott Gates wrote:
> > I've installed SL 6.6 on an Dell Inspiron 1420 laptop. upgraded
.
> >mark hansel
> >
> =
>
>
> Do you know about http://www.dshield.org ? They collect reports of
> attempted ssh connections, among other things.
>
> Stephen Isard
>
--
Thanks,
Jamie Duncan
@jamieeduncan
d professional support, training, and services
> providers. We are committed to keeping Docker open source under the Apache
> 2.0 license.
>
> Yasha Karant
>
> End quote.
>
--
Thanks,
Jamie Duncan
@jamieeduncan
> Scientific Linux team then it might be but it will take their 'when I have
> time'
>
>
>
>> Regards,
>> Carel
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Stephen J Smoogen.
>
>
--
Thanks,
Jamie Duncan
@jamieeduncan
. I am a Red Hat customer. But of course, one
> license will not do. You need a bunch of entitlements to get access to all
> channels. And on a yearly basis too. HA, RHSCL, ...
>
> For only accessing the SRPMs and rebuilding it adds up quickly.
>
>
> --
> -- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/
> -- dagit linux solutions, cont...@dagit.net, http://dagit.net/
>
> [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
>
--
Thanks,
Jamie Duncan
@jamieeduncan
? All the SL maintainers need is one (1) Red Hat customer,
> anywhere on the planet, to obtain the source DVDs and give them a
> copy. Then they can build just like they always have...
>
--
Thanks,
Jamie Duncan
@jamieeduncan
286773535ad900f4761e6e421440add41273 (plain) <---
>
> https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/livecd/plain/tools/livecd-iso-to-disk.sh
>
> Brandon Vincent
>
--
Thanks,
Jamie Duncan
@jamieeduncan
ted services.
>
> Also, for reasons we could discuss off-list (or on list if you prefer), my
> personal preference is for Xen as a virtualisation suites. My
> understanding is that Xen does well integrate into a number of environments
> and distros.
>
> Yasha Karant
>
&g
rise
> Virtualization <http://www.redhat.com/virtualization/rhev/>.
>
> but that the fedorahosted project above is obsolete, replaced by:
>
> http://www.ovirt.org/Subprojects
>
> in which any mention of TUV by name is in the title of each reference.
>
> Yasha Karant
>
--
Thanks,
Jamie Duncan
@jamieeduncan
ink to "/usr/bin" that it's going to create a lot of cross
>> compatibility and software porting issues. I'm not looking forward to
>> that part. I'm also afraid to see that I've not yet seen a single
>> reason to *want* it, other than updated libraries for third party
>> software such as perl modules.
>>
>>
--
Thanks,
Jamie Duncan
@jamieeduncan
t;
>
>
>>
>> Is SL not PCI compliant because it is not a commercial
>> effort? I thought SL got all the patches the RHEL
>> got? Please elucidate.
>>
>>
> There is no PCI requirement(s) to use commercial OS. Please read the
> requirements instead of FUD!
>
> --
> Eero
>
>
--
Thanks,
Jamie Duncan
@jamieeduncan
PCI compliance is a lot more than just the code. Red Hat goes through
multiple processes with these governing bodies to certify RHEL. That
doesn't pass down to downstream distributions.
On Apr 8, 2014 11:32 PM, "ToddAndMargo" wrote:
> On 04/08/2014 08:25 PM, Paul Robert Marino wrote:
>
>> Well fr
~~~
> Computers are like air conditioners.
> They malfunction when you open windows
> ~~~~~~
>
--
Thanks,
Jamie Duncan
@jamieeduncan
at Riehecky
>>
>> Scientific Linux developer
>> http://www.scientificlinux.org/
>>
>
>
>
> --
> --
> Jeffrey Anderson| jdander...@lbl.gov
> Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory |
> Office: 50A-5104E | Mailstop 50A-5101
> Phone: 510 486-4208 | Fax: 510 486-4204
>
--
Thanks,
Jamie Duncan
@jamieeduncan
2260 Apollo Way
> 707.522.1000 Santa Rosa, CA 95407
>
--
Thanks,
Jamie Duncan
@jamieeduncan
be surprised of RHEL 7 GA will be this
> year.
>
> --
> --Jos Vos
> --X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364
> -- Amsterdam, The Netherlands| Fax: +31 20 6948204
>
--
Thanks,
Jamie Duncan
@jamieeduncan
>>> Error: Protected multilib versions:
>>>> raptor-1.4.21-0.10.el6.x86_64 !=
>>>> raptor-1.4.18-5.el6_2.1.x86___**__64\
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What is a "Protected mu
___**__64\
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> What is a "Protected multilib version"? And, how do I
>>> fix it?
>>>
>>> Many thanks,
>>> -T
>>>
>>>
also, yum remove would work just as well, and not confuse the yum db.
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Jamie Duncan wrote:
> do you need all of those 32-bit libs?
>
>
> On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Todd And Margo Chester <
> toddandma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>&g
gt;> Error: Protected multilib versions: raptor-1.4.21-0.10.el6.x86_64 !=
>>> raptor-1.4.18-5.el6_2.1.x86___**64\
>>>
>>>
>>> What is a "Protected multilib version"? And, how do I
>>> fix it?
>>>
>>> M
8-5.el6_2.1.x86_**64\
>
> What is a "Protected multilib version"? And, how do I
> fix it?
>
> Many thanks,
> -T
>
--
Thanks,
Jamie Duncan
@jamieeduncan
Ah. hadn't noticed that.
Does SL submit directly to upstream projects, or exclusively to RH?
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Matthias Schroeder <
matthias.schro...@cern.ch> wrote:
>
> On Feb 4, 2013, at 5:36 PM, Jamie Duncan wrote:
>
> I just wasn't
That's our patch around modprobe snd-hda-intel kernel crashing. It
> placed to RH BugZilla, but is not approved by Red Hat at this time.
>
> В Пнд, 04/02/2013 в 10:46 -0500, Jamie Duncan пишет:
> > That link gives links to "bug-fixed" packages, but the Bugzilla is
> > sti
; I'm using SL5.8
> > After a short shutdown today the machine came up with kernel panic
> (can't find
> > root).
>
> It's may be consequence of file system damaging or grub
> misconfiguration.
>
> But we found & fix some NULL-pointer references in sound subsystem of
> last 5x kernel updates:
>
>
> http://listserv.fnal.gov/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind1302&L=scientific-linux-devel&T=0&P=348
>
--
Thanks,
Jamie Duncan
@jamieeduncan
s/6.3/6.4/g
sorry for the typo.
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Jamie Duncan
> wrote:
> > Red Hat is releasing RHEL 6.3 in approximately 4 weeks.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:20 AM, jdo
el. That one only supports
> through nvidia 304 and the download is 310.
>
> {^_^}
>
--
Thanks,
Jamie Duncan
@jamieeduncan
"The management tool, "libvirt" and "virt-manager", are a direct violation
of *EVERY
SINGLE ONE* of the open source GUI guidelines described by Eric
Raymond in his essay, "The Luxury of Ignorance", including the
postscript guidelines from me that he added later."
Libvirt isn't a by gui tool. It is
https://access.redhat.com/knowledge/solutions/18734
On Dec 23, 2012 10:01 PM, "CS DBA" wrote:
> Hi All;
>
> 2 questions:
>
> 1) I'm considering using KVM for Virtual Machines in a production
> environment.
>Good plan? Any drawbacks? better choices?
>
>
> 2) I've found many guides on the web
age point and that is why we stalled at 5.8.
>
> From some others I have talked to have tried it and found that they love it
> and they indicated that were running Fedora.
>
> Larry Linder
>
--
Thanks,
Jamie Duncan
804.571.0458
; between abc.triumf.ca and abc.Trumf.CA (note capital letters), another
> thing
> to watch for that may trip-up the NFSv4 idmapd.
>
> Good luck!
>
> --
> Konstantin Olchanski
> Data Acquisition Systems: The Bytes Must Flow!
> Email: olchansk-at-triumf-dot-ca
> Snail mail: 4004 Wesbrook Mall, TRIUMF, Vancouver, B.C., V6T 2A3, Canada
>
--
Thanks,
Jamie Duncan
804.571.0458
which I
> also let complete a slow init over the weekend. I was in fact trying to do
> a pvcreate on the volume when it hung.
>
> Can anyone shed some light? I see posts for it but everything I read
> suggests it's been taken care of.
>
--
Thanks,
Jamie Duncan
804.571.0458
run of the service at boot (level 3 and 5)
>the sendmail deamon is started
>the configuration is the standard one
>try to send an e-mail results dead.letter?
>Forgot somethings?
>
--
Thanks,
Jamie Duncan
ep 29, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Jamie Duncan wrote:
> So Fedora has a front-end for a package it doesn't have? That doesn't make
> a lot of sense...
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Ben Ruijl wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately those packages only provide a graphical frontend.
age that is missing.
>
> I'll post a message in the developer mailing list to ask for inclusion of
> this
> package.
>
--
Thanks,
Jamie Duncan
This is something I've always wondered, but never seen
a consistent attitude on
When a RHEL-derived distribution find new vulnerabilities, what process do
they go to report and address them?
- Do they go directly upstream?
- Do they report them in RHEL's bugzilla?
- Do they patch interna
36 matches
Mail list logo
