Policy on Scientific Linux(SL) Life Cycle
We plan on following the TUV Life Cycle. Currently that is a total of
10 years. See http://www.scientificlinux.org/distributions/
We expect to continue releasing Scientific Linux(SL) just
as we have in the past. *
* Provided TUV continue
On 06/11/2012 08:39 AM, Connie Sieh wrote:
Policy on Scientific Linux(SL) Life Cycle
We plan on following the TUV Life Cycle. Currently that is a total of
10 years. See http://www.scientificlinux.org/distributions/
We expect to continue releasing Scientific Linux(SL) just
as
On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, Yasha Karant wrote:
On 06/11/2012 08:39 AM, Connie Sieh wrote:
Policy on Scientific Linux(SL) Life Cycle
We plan on following the TUV Life Cycle. Currently that is a total of
10 years. See http://www.scientificlinux.org/distributions/
We expect to continue
On 06/12/2012 03:49 AM, Yasha Karant wrote:
On 06/11/2012 08:39 AM, Connie Sieh wrote:
Policy on Scientific Linux(SL) Life Cycle
We plan on following the TUV Life Cycle. Currently that is a total of
10 years. See http://www.scientificlinux.org/distributions/
We expect to continue releasing Scie
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Yasha Karant wrote:
> On 06/11/2012 08:39 AM, Connie Sieh wrote:
>
>> Policy on Scientific Linux(SL) Life Cycle
>>
>> We plan on following the TUV Life Cycle. Currently that is a total of
>> 10 years. See
>> http://www.scientificlinux.**org/distributions
On 06/11/2012 07:49 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
[snip]
If I am missing something, is there a discussion link (URL) of the
issues, preferably not in legalese?
There are dozens of threads, and there's the acutal licensing in the
RPM's and SRPM's. Take a good look in /usr/share/doc/[packag
On 06/13/2012 01:31 AM, Yasha Karant wrote:
On 06/11/2012 07:49 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
[snip]
If I am missing something, is there a discussion link (URL) of the
issues, preferably not in legalese?
There are dozens of threads, and there's the acutal licensing in the
RPM's and SRPM's. Take
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:11:23AM +0900, zxq9 wrote:
> On 06/12/2012 03:49 AM, Yasha Karant wrote:
> >
> >Am I missing something here? I thought under the GPL as well as various
> >other open source licenses, TUV was required to make available the full
> >source from which the full non-encumbered
On 06/13/2012 06:44 AM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
(On this list, are we really required to say "TUV" instead of "***censored***",
as if we were playing a 1984 double-speak live action game?)
Yes, because lawyers have made even casual conversation a legal
minefield for reasons other than get
On 06/12/2012 02:44 PM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:11:23AM +0900, zxq9 wrote:
On 06/12/2012 03:49 AM, Yasha Karant wrote:
Am I missing something here? I thought under the GPL as well as various
other open source licenses, TUV was required to make available the full
zxq9 wrote on 6/13/2012 12:32 AM:
On 06/13/2012 06:44 AM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
(On this list, are we really required to say "TUV" instead of "***censored***",
as if we were playing a 1984 double-speak live action game?)
Yes, because lawyers have made even casual conversation a legal mi
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:57 PM, P. Larry Nelson wrote:
> zxq9 wrote on 6/13/2012 12:32 AM:
>> On 06/13/2012 06:44 AM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
>>
>>> (On this list, are we really required to say "TUV" instead of
>>> "***censored***",
>>> as if we were playing a 1984 double-speak live action g
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012, P. Larry Nelson wrote:
zxq9 wrote on 6/13/2012 12:32 AM:
On 06/13/2012 06:44 AM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
(On this list, are we really required to say "TUV" instead of "***censored***",
as if we were playing a 1984 double-speak live action game?)
Yes, because lawyers
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 08:58:44AM -0700, Yasha Karant wrote:
> On 06/12/2012 02:44 PM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
> >
> >For GPL-licensed code, ...
>
> As you understand the legal situation ...
>
No, I do not understand the legal situation.
I only repeat what is considered to be the common und
On 06/14/2012 02:23 AM, Tom H wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:57 PM, P. Larry Nelson wrote:
zxq9 wrote on 6/13/2012 12:32 AM:
On 06/13/2012 06:44 AM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
(On this list, are we really required to say "TUV" instead of
"***censored***",
as if we were playing a 1984 dou
15 matches
Mail list logo
