n truly thought
> about the
> > > 3D, integrated into the movie, made decisions based on making sure it
> > > enhanced, not distracted. But I think some directors aren't taking that
> time
> > > and care.
> > >
> > >
> > > - Original
e, made decisions based on making sure it
> > enhanced, not distracted. But I think some directors aren't taking that time
> > and care.
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Kelwyn"
> > To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
>
ecisions based on making sure it
> enhanced, not distracted. But I think some directors aren't taking that time
> and care.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Kelwyn"
> To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 8:22:03 AM GMT -05:00
ut
I think some directors aren't taking that time and care.
- Original Message -
From: "Kelwyn"
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 8:22:03 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: 'Dragon' makes weekend debut at No. 1
I saw "Alice" and I was powerfully underwhelmed. Unlike my "Avatar"
experience, the glasses was large and clunky and whole thing felt like watching
a movie through one of those old View-masters. The colors and "3-D" were also
reminiscent of View-master viewing.
Oddly, I was more enchanted by
