Re: [scifinoir2] Re: Four Spider-Man 3 Villains!

2006-06-07 Thread Daryle Lockhart
yet? That's the kind of fumbling we're worried about. _ From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daryle Lockhart Sent: Tuesday, 06 June, 2006 21:46 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Re: Four Spider-Man 3 Villains! I have to disagree

Re: [scifinoir2] Re: Four Spider-Man 3 Villains!

2006-06-07 Thread KeithBJohnson
: [scifinoir2] Re: Four Spider-Man 3 Villains! I have to disagree with you guys on this one. This is Spider man. In the books, Peter's POVERTY is a villian. His CLASS schedule. It's time for a movie that doesn't treat the audience like a bunch of slow bus children. The character is a broke college

Re: [scifinoir2] Re: Four Spider-Man 3 Villains!

2006-06-07 Thread Martin Pratt
@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of g123curious Sent: Tuesday, 06 June, 2006 17:26 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Four Spider-Man 3 Villains! Didn't a certain Batman film have 3 villains? ANd that film sucked. More isn't necessarily better. I hope

Re: [scifinoir2] Re: Four Spider-Man 3 Villains!

2006-06-07 Thread Daryle Lockhart
] On Behalf Of g123curious Sent: Tuesday, 06 June, 2006 17:26 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Four Spider-Man 3 Villains! Didn't a certain Batman film have 3 villains? ANd that film sucked. More isn't necessarily better. I hope that the script for SM3 is good and that the quantity

[scifinoir2] Re: Four Spider-Man 3 Villains!

2006-06-06 Thread g123curious
Didn't a certain Batman film have 3 villains? ANd that film sucked. More isn't necessarily better. I hope that the script for SM3 is good and that the quantity of villains isn't a coverup for a low quality script. George --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Said Kakese Dibinga [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Four Spider-Man 3 Villains!

2006-06-06 Thread Keith Johnson
, with a good, tight script maybe... _ From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of g123curious Sent: Tuesday, 06 June, 2006 17:26 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Four Spider-Man 3 Villains! Didn't a certain Batman film have 3 villains

Re: [scifinoir2] Re: Four Spider-Man 3 Villains!

2006-06-06 Thread Daryle Lockhart
as a result. But as you said, with a good, tight script maybe... _ From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of g123curious Sent: Tuesday, 06 June, 2006 17:26 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Four Spider-Man 3 Villains! Didn't a certain

RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Four Spider-Man 3 Villains!

2006-06-06 Thread Keith Johnson
Lockhart Sent: Tuesday, 06 June, 2006 21:46 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Re: Four Spider-Man 3 Villains! I have to disagree with you guys on this one. This is Spider man. In the books, Peter's POVERTY is a villian. His CLASS schedule. It's time for a movie

Re: [scifinoir2] Re: Four Spider-Man 3 Villains!

2006-06-06 Thread Tracey de Morsella (formerly Tracey L. Minor)
: [scifinoir2] Re: Four Spider-Man 3 Villains! Didn't a certain Batman film have 3 villains? ANd that film sucked. More isn't necessarily better. I hope that the script for SM3 is good and that the quantity of villains isn't a coverup for a low quality script. George --- In [EMAIL