Isn't that the truth? Very interesting, rewarding, and humbling...
---Original Message---
From: Astromancer
Date: 08/19/05 11:57:42
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] What is your ecological footprint?
In the process of making yourself over, revelations,
lp we
can get to improve ours.
I have had some revelations about myself during this process...
Maurice
---Original Message---
From: Astromancer
Date: 08/18/05 21:19:40
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] What is your ecological footprint?
I am ensuring that I remember
---
From: Astromancer
Date: 08/18/05 21:19:40
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] What is your ecological footprint?
I am ensuring that I remember every moment of this poverty I am in so that I
NEVER return to it...working very hard to get out of it too...
M C Jennings <[EM
5
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] What is your ecological footprint?
Not...
M C Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Somaybe being poor is good,
huh? Less to waste...
ok, maybe not... :o)
---Original Message---
From: Astromancer
Date: 08/17/05 2
ot one bit
sorry! LOLLOL!
Maurice
---Original Message---
From: Astromancer
Date: 08/18/05 18:19:05
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] What is your ecological footprint?
Not...
M C Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Somaybe being poor is good,
huh? Les
Not...
M C Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Somaybe being poor is good, huh?
Less to waste...
ok, maybe not... :o)
---Original Message---
From: Astromancer
Date: 08/17/05 23:11:06
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] What is your ecological foo
Somaybe being poor is good, huh? Less to waste...
ok, maybe not... :o)
---Original Message---
From: Astromancer
Date: 08/17/05 23:11:06
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] What is your ecological footprint?
Lower is better...Mine was 11...only because
9
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] What is your ecological footprint?
Mine was 20, interesting website!
lois
g123curious <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In the Star Trek universe, almost all energy and resource consumption
issues in the Federation have been solved; except for the tear in
Thanks. Then that means I'm dumping toxic waste in my backyard under the
swing-set! :o)
---Original Message---
From: Laileana
Date: 08/17/05 20:37:49
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] What is your ecological footprint?
I think lower was supposed
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] What is your ecological footprint?
Mine was 20, interesting website!
lois
g123curious <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In the Star Trek universe, almost all energy and resource consumption
issues in the Federation have been solved; except for the tear in
subspace due to w
"g123curious" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>In the Star Trek universe, almost all energy and resource consumption
>issues in the Federation have been solved; except for the tear in
>subspace due to warp travel. Which makes one ask: how are we doing
>today versus that ideal? To answer that questio
Mine was 48. What's better, higher or lower? I still missed that at the
site...
Maurice
---Original Message---
From: Laileana
Date: 08/17/05 15:42:29
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] What is your ecological footprint?
Mine was 20, interesting we
Mine was 20, interesting website!
lois
g123curious <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In the Star Trek universe, almost all energy and resource consumption
issues in the Federation have been solved; except for the tear in
subspace due to warp travel. Which makes one ask: how are we doing
today versus th
In the Star Trek universe, almost all energy and resource consumption
issues in the Federation have been solved; except for the tear in
subspace due to warp travel. Which makes one ask: how are we doing
today versus that ideal? To answer that question, I thought that you
might enjoy taking this
14 matches
Mail list logo
