+1
cheers,
satra
___
scikit-learn mailing list
scikit-learn@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
+1
___
scikit-learn mailing list
scikit-learn@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
+1 from me.
Cheers,
Loïc
___
scikit-learn mailing list
scikit-learn@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
+1
Arnaud
> On 19 Feb 2019, at 21:48, Gilles Louppe wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 at 20:40, Fabian Pedregosa wrote:
>>
>> +1 (not sure if my previous email went through)
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 11:31 AM Andreas Mueller wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2/19/19 10:55 AM, Paolo Los
+1
On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 at 20:40, Fabian Pedregosa wrote:
>
> +1 (not sure if my previous email went through)
>
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 11:31 AM Andreas Mueller wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2/19/19 10:55 AM, Paolo Losi wrote:
>> > +1 if my opinion matters
>> >
>> Thank you and it does :)
>>
>>
>>
+1 (not sure if my previous email went through)
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 11:31 AM Andreas Mueller wrote:
>
>
> On 2/19/19 10:55 AM, Paolo Losi wrote:
> > +1 if my opinion matters
> >
> Thank you and it does :)
>
>
> ___
> scikit-learn mailing list
> sci
On 2/19/19 10:55 AM, Paolo Losi wrote:
+1 if my opinion matters
Thank you and it does :)
___
scikit-learn mailing list
scikit-learn@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
+1 if my opinion matters
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 4:39 PM Andreas Mueller wrote:
> A good time to remind all core devs to vote (or abstain).
>
> +1 from me as well (as might be expected), I didn't want to put my vote in
> my call for the vote.
>
> Participation is not super high (as might be expe
A good time to remind all core devs to vote (or abstain).
+1 from me as well (as might be expected), I didn't want to put my vote
in my call for the vote.
Participation is not super high (as might be expected), 13 of the 49
core devs voted so far..
There are some people who have voiced opin
And a +1 from me as well
Op di 19 feb. 2019 11:47 schreef Joel Nothman Uhh... I forgot to vote. +1 :)
>
> It seems there's some consensus.
> ___
> scikit-learn mailing list
> scikit-learn@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-lear
Uhh... I forgot to vote. +1 :)
It seems there's some consensus.
___
scikit-learn mailing list
scikit-learn@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
mail.com>
>>>> >> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >> +1 from me as well. Thanks for putting in the time to write
>>>> this all
>>>> >> out.
>>>> >
>>>> >> On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 4:
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> +1 from me as well. Thanks for putting in the time to write
>>> this all
>>> >> out.
>>> >
>>> >> On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 4:54 PM Hanmin Qin &
>> >> On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 4:54 PM Hanmin Qin <
>> qinhanmin2...@sina.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >
>> >> +1 (personally I still think it's better to keep the flow
>> chart, it
>> >>
art, it
> >> seems useful for beginners)
> >
> >> Hanmin Qin
> >
> >> - Original Message -
> >> From: Alexandre Gramfort
> >> To: Scikit-lear
seems useful for beginners)
>
>> Hanmin Qin
>
>> - Original Message -----
>> From: Alexandre Gramfort
>> To: Scikit-learn mailing list
>> Subject: Re: [scikit-learn] VOTE: scikit-learn
till think it's better to keep the flow chart,
> it
> seems useful for beginners)
> Hanmin Qin
> - Original Message -
> From: Alexandre Gramfort
> To: Scikit-learn mailing list
> S
ssage -----
>>> From: Alexandre Gramfort
>>> To: Scikit-learn mailing list
>>> Subject: Re: [scikit-learn] VOTE: scikit-learn governance document
>>> Date: 2019-02-11 01:29
>>>
>>> +1 for me too
>>>
>>> Alex
>>>
>>&
keep the flow chart, it seems
>> useful for beginners)
>>
>> Hanmin Qin
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: Alexandre Gramfort
>> To: Scikit-learn mailing list
>> Subject: Re: [scikit-learn] VOTE: scikit-learn governance document
>> Date: 20
-
> From: Alexandre Gramfort
> To: Scikit-learn mailing list
> Subject: Re: [scikit-learn] VOTE: scikit-learn governance document
> Date: 2019-02-11 01:29
>
> +1 for me too
>
> Alex
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 10:06 PM Gilles Louppe wrote:
>
> Hi Andy,
>
+1 (personally I still think it's better to keep the flow chart, it seems
useful for beginners)
Hanmin Qin
- Original Message -
From: Alexandre Gramfort
To: Scikit-learn mailing list
Subject: Re: [scikit-learn] VOTE: scikit-learn governance document
Date: 2019-02-11 01:29
+1 for m
Thanks for chiming in Gilles!
On 2/9/19 4:03 PM, Gilles Louppe wrote:
Hi Andy,
I read through to document. Even though I have not been really active
these past months/years, I think it summarizes well our governance
model.
+1.
Gilles
On Sat, 9 Feb 2019 at 12:01, Adrin wrote:
+1
Thanks fo
+1 for me too
Alex
On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 10:06 PM Gilles Louppe wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> I read through to document. Even though I have not been really active
> these past months/years, I think it summarizes well our governance
> model.
>
> +1.
>
> Gilles
>
> On Sat, 9 Feb 2019 at 12:01, Adrin
Hi Andy,
I read through to document. Even though I have not been really active
these past months/years, I think it summarizes well our governance
model.
+1.
Gilles
On Sat, 9 Feb 2019 at 12:01, Adrin wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Thanks for the work you've put in it!
>
> On Sat, Feb 9, 2019, 03:00 Andreas
+1
Thanks for the work you've put in it!
On Sat, Feb 9, 2019, 03:00 Andreas Mueller Hey all.
>
> I want to call a vote on the final version on the scikit-learn
> governance document, which can be found in this PR:
>
> https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/pull/12878
>
> It underwent some
Hey all.
I want to call a vote on the final version on the scikit-learn
governance document, which can be found in this PR:
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/pull/12878
It underwent some significant changes in the last couple of weeks.
The two-sentence summary is: conflicts are re
26 matches
Mail list logo
