Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Announce: scikit-learn 0.9

2011-09-23 Thread bdholt1
If we are going to redeploy the docs, then perhaps we could make a note on the 'work in progress' about Decision Trees, and that ensemble learners are in planning! -Original Message- From: Mathieu Blondel Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 14:03:57 To: Reply-To: math...@mblondel.org, scikit-learn

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Announce: scikit-learn 0.9

2011-09-23 Thread Mathieu Blondel
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 8:09 AM, Gael Varoquaux wrote: > Good point, it is a bit off currently. I have fixed in on github. fabian, > could you redploy a version of the docs to avoid having wrong info on the > web. The logo may need an update too. Mathieu

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Announce: scikit-learn 0.9

2011-09-23 Thread Gael Varoquaux
Good point, it is a bit off currently. I have fixed in on github. fabian, could you redploy a version of the docs to avoid having wrong info on the web. Cheers, Gael On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 12:30:06PM -0700, Michael Waskom wrote: >Hi Folks, >Just a note that in the install docs it direct

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Scikit-learn renaming: success

2011-09-23 Thread Gael Varoquaux
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 03:07:32PM -0400, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: >Skipper and I spent some time coming up with a non-generic, "googlable" >name. That was a clever move, quite clearly. Gael -- All of the data

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Announce: scikit-learn 0.9

2011-09-23 Thread Michael Waskom
Hi Folks, Just a note that in the install docs it directs you to use "sklearn" with pip/easy install: http://scikit-learn.sourceforge.net/stable/install.html#easy-install When, in fact, one should be searching for "scikit-learn." It doesn't work with sklearn. Otherwise, congrats on the release!

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Scikit-learn renaming: success

2011-09-23 Thread josef . pktd
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Mathieu Blondel wrote: > On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 3:17 AM, Skipper Seabold > wrote: > > > I thought the main goal when we started talking about dropping scikits > > was simply to avoid having namespace packages. It sounds like this is > > no longer the focus? > > W

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Scikit-learn renaming: success

2011-09-23 Thread Mathieu Blondel
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 3:17 AM, Skipper Seabold wrote: > I thought the main goal when we started talking about dropping scikits > was simply to avoid having namespace packages. It sounds like this is > no longer the focus? We asked on the ML what import name people liked best, and there was a l

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Scikit-learn renaming: success

2011-09-23 Thread Skipper Seabold
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Mathieu Blondel wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 2:57 AM, Alexandre Gramfort > wrote: > > I feel there is 2 different things: on one side the package name in > > pypi, the url and the doc > > and the other side the import name. scikit-learn will continue to be >

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Scikit-learn renaming: success

2011-09-23 Thread Mathieu Blondel
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 2:57 AM, Alexandre Gramfort wrote: > I feel there is 2 different things: on one side the package name in > pypi, the url and the doc > and the other side the import name. scikit-learn will continue to be > called and advertised as > scikit-learn. sklearn is just the import

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Scikit-learn renaming: success

2011-09-23 Thread Alexandre Gramfort
I feel there is 2 different things: on one side the package name in pypi, the url and the doc and the other side the import name. scikit-learn will continue to be called and advertised as scikit-learn. sklearn is just the import name. I don't pronounce it I just type it :) Alex On Fri, Sep 23, 20

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Scikit-learn renaming: success

2011-09-23 Thread Gael Varoquaux
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 03:04:07PM +0200, Nelle Varoquaux wrote: >Out of curiosity, did any of the other scikit move to a new name prefixed >with sk? I saw the scikits.data people (unreleased yet) last week, and they talking of skdata. They find the name funny. Gael -

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Scikit-learn renaming: success

2011-09-23 Thread Stéfan van der Walt
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Skipper Seabold wrote: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 9:04 AM, Nelle Varoquaux > wrote: >> Out of curiosity, did any of the other scikit move to a new name prefixed >> with sk? Is this something the scikits community is willing to do long term? We have the problem tha

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Scikit-learn renaming: success

2011-09-23 Thread Skipper Seabold
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 9:04 AM, Nelle Varoquaux wrote: > Out of curiosity, did any of the other scikit move to a new name prefixed > with sk? Is this something the scikits community is willing to do long term? > Cheers, I can't say for sure, but I'm fairly certain that statsmodels is planning to

[Scikit-learn-general] sklearn 0.9 test failure under Mageia

2011-09-23 Thread Claire Revillet
Hello, I packaged new version for Mageia. I just had 1 failure under i586 (none under x86_64). My configuration is : python 2.7.2 numpy 1.6.1 scipy 0.9.0 lapack 3.3.1 atlas 3.8.3 Here is my test log: == FAIL: Check that lars_pa

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Scikit-learn renaming: success

2011-09-23 Thread Nelle Varoquaux
Out of curiosity, did any of the other scikit move to a new name prefixed with sk? Is this something the scikits community is willing to do long term? Cheers, Nelle On 22 September 2011 16:02, Gael Varoquaux wrote: > Thanks to combined work with Stefan and Janto Dreijer, the scikit-learn > is st

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] as we move to ensemble learning

2011-09-23 Thread Paolo Losi
Definitely a very nice article! Thanks for posting it here. It would be very nice to have extra trees in scikits learn... Ciao Paolo On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:48 AM, Satrajit Ghosh wrote: > i was recently introduced to the following random forests implementation at > a workshop: > http://orbi