Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Submiting scikit-learn as a Software Freedom Conservancy

2011-10-10 Thread Vincent Michel
+1, seems good to me. 2011/10/10 Fabian Pedregosa > +1 for me too! > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Robert Layton > wrote: > > Sounds good (I can't believe I missed that page!). > > +1 > > - Robert > > > > On 10 October 2011 08:38, Olivier Grisel > wrote: > >> > >> 2011/10/9 Robert Layto

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Submiting scikit-learn as a Software Freedom Conservancy

2011-10-10 Thread Fabian Pedregosa
+1 for me too! On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Robert Layton wrote: > Sounds good (I can't believe I missed that page!). >  +1 > - Robert > > On 10 October 2011 08:38, Olivier Grisel wrote: >> >> 2011/10/9 Robert Layton : >> > A quick question I wasn't able to find in the website... are there

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Submiting scikit-learn as a Software Freedom Conservancy

2011-10-09 Thread Robert Layton
Sounds good (I can't believe I missed that page!). +1 - Robert On 10 October 2011 08:38, Olivier Grisel wrote: > 2011/10/9 Robert Layton : > > A quick question I wasn't able to find in the website... are there any > > reporting/administrative obligations required as part of joining? i.e. > wou

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Submiting scikit-learn as a Software Freedom Conservancy

2011-10-09 Thread Olivier Grisel
2011/10/9 Robert Layton : > A quick question I wasn't able to find in the website... are there any > reporting/administrative obligations required as part of joining? i.e. would > this project need to tick any extra boxes as part of an ongoing commitment? > Other than that (and I assume even if the

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Submiting scikit-learn as a Software Freedom Conservancy

2011-10-09 Thread Robert Layton
A quick question I wasn't able to find in the website... are there any reporting/administrative obligations required as part of joining? i.e. would this project need to tick any extra boxes as part of an ongoing commitment? Other than that (and I assume even if there are mild requirements) this so

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Submiting scikit-learn as a Software Freedom Conservancy

2011-10-09 Thread Gael Varoquaux
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 03:26:33AM +0900, Mathieu Blondel wrote: > Not sure how feasible it is but one way would be for the companies to > pay the tickets directly. Might work with some of them (we are trying) but not all. G ---

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Submiting scikit-learn as a Software Freedom Conservancy

2011-10-09 Thread Mathieu Blondel
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:11 AM, Olivier Grisel wrote: > If nobody objects I will do the submission for scikit-learn. +1, thanks for doing it! > We will have to find something else Not sure how feasible it is but one way would be for the companies to pay the tickets directly. Mathieu ---

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Submiting scikit-learn as a Software Freedom Conservancy

2011-10-09 Thread Gael Varoquaux
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 08:11:00PM +0200, Olivier Grisel wrote: > If nobody objects I will do the submission for scikit-learn. I am +1, as you know. Gaël -- All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriousl

[Scikit-learn-general] Submiting scikit-learn as a Software Freedom Conservancy

2011-10-09 Thread Olivier Grisel
Hi all, Gael and I have been trying to contact companies to sponsor the NIPS 2011 sprint in Granada (mainly funding the travel expenses). https://github.com/scikit-learn/Tmp-Scikit-learn/blob/master/sprint_nips_2011/proposal.rst We got some positive feedback however it's a bit tricky to find