I like the idea since I like ebooks. However, I will be honest and say
that for code development I would not be too likely to use it since on my
desktop machines I don't have a great epub viewers.
So I guess I would say that if there was no extra effort or file space
required go ahead and add it b
On 04.10.2013 20:19, Gary Oberbrunner wrote:
[...]
Feature branches seem to be the worst part of hg IMHO. Dirk, your
workflow seems OK, although a bit indirect; you could run into
problems once your changes are accepted, pulling back in. Russel,
would Dirk's setup work for you? Alternatively
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Dirk Bächle wrote:
> Hi Russel,
>
>
> On 04.10.2013 19:23, Russel Winder wrote:
>
>> Now we have default and python3-port as working branches, we need a
>> workflow that ensures they are kept in sync. If python3-port is left
>> behind, then all the work to date wil
On Fri, 2013-10-04 at 20:10 +0200, Dirk Bächle wrote:
[…]
> hmmm, we probably should discuss (and then decide) how we want
> development to look like, once we have a working python3 branch. Will we
> continue to support both major versions 2.x and 3.x? If yes, in which
> direction (2->3 or 3->2)
Hi Russel,
On 04.10.2013 19:23, Russel Winder wrote:
Now we have default and python3-port as working branches, we need a
workflow that ensures they are kept in sync. If python3-port is left
behind, then all the work to date will have been for nought.
hmmm, we probably should discuss (and then
Now we have default and python3-port as working branches, we need a
workflow that ensures they are kept in sync. If python3-port is left
behind, then all the work to date will have been for nought.
I also need advice on how to handle "feature clones": I have the
SCons_D_Tooling clone and have no i
Hi devs,
since we're now using DocBook as source format for all our
documentation, it would technically be relatively easy to publish things
like the MAN page or the UserGuide in EPUB format as well.
The latest versions of "pandoc" (> 1.12.x) offer a DocBook reader and do
a, more or less, good
