Re: [Scons-dev] scons: path-like objects

Hi Mats, On 04.09.19 19:29, Mats Wichmann wrote: does anyone think it is important to examine scons for support of Python path-like objects? I think this is important enough to put some research effort in it. But only if we're talking about the FS-centric Node classes "Node.FS.Base" and

Re: [Scons-dev] Twitter poll on dropping py27 support

I am also +1 to drop Python 2 support. On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 10:37 AM Jason Kenny wrote: > Being non Twitter as well > > +1 on dropping python 2 > > Get Outlook for Android > > -- > *From:* Scons-dev on behalf of Ivan Van > Laningham >

Re: [Scons-dev] Twitter poll on dropping py27 support

Mats, We did a deprecation cycle last time we dropped python version support. Could roll a 3.1.2 with current updates and add deprecation warning to it.. -Bill On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 1:57 PM Mats Wichmann wrote: > On 9/5/19 1:23 PM, Bill Deegan wrote: > >

Re: [Scons-dev] Twitter poll on dropping py27 support

On 9/5/19 1:23 PM, Bill Deegan wrote: > https://twitter.com/SConsProject/status/1169688929903230976?s=20 I voted, but I guess it depends on how near "in the near future" is. do you want to do a deprecation cycle? the python version supported isn't really an "scons feature" so I don't know if

Re: [Scons-dev] Twitter poll on dropping py27 support

Being non Twitter as well +1 on dropping python 2 Get Outlook for Android From: Scons-dev on behalf of Ivan Van Laningham Sent: Friday, September 6, 2019 10:11:29 AM To: SCons developer list Subject: Re: [Scons-dev] Twitter poll on

Re: [Scons-dev] Twitter poll on dropping py27 support

It was asked earlier if there were options for non-twitter users. That's me. Metta, Ivan On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 8:53 AM Bill Deegan wrote: > Ivan, > > If possible vote on Twitter. > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 10:50 AM Ivan Van Laningham > wrote: > >> My vote probably doesn't count for much,

Re: [Scons-dev] Twitter poll on dropping py27 support

Ivan, If possible vote on Twitter. On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 10:50 AM Ivan Van Laningham wrote: > My vote probably doesn't count for much, but I vote yes, drop py27. > > Metta, > Ivan > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 8:47 AM Bill Deegan > wrote: > >> Yes. scons-local packages are still published. >>

Re: [Scons-dev] Twitter poll on dropping py27 support

My vote probably doesn't count for much, but I vote yes, drop py27. Metta, Ivan On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 8:47 AM Bill Deegan wrote: > Yes. scons-local packages are still published. > > Dropping py27 allows us to get rid of a bunch of if PY3/PY27 code. Also > we can start using PY3.5+ specific

Re: [Scons-dev] Twitter poll on dropping py27 support

Yes. scons-local packages are still published. Dropping py27 allows us to get rid of a bunch of if PY3/PY27 code. Also we can start using PY3.5+ specific packages/logic. (This will reduce the maintenance/testing load once the old code is purged) -Bill On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 10:38 AM anatoly

Re: [Scons-dev] Twitter poll on dropping py27 support

What are pros and cons of dropping `py27`? I did not monitor anything recently. Can SCons still be dropped into target repository and work from there without any additional dependencies? On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 3:51 PM Bill Deegan wrote: > > Feel free to send to users mailing list > > On Fri,

Re: [Scons-dev] Twitter poll on dropping py27 support

Feel free to send to users mailing list On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 5:52 AM anatoly techtonik wrote: > Any voting options for non-Twitter people? > > > On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 10:23 PM Bill Deegan > wrote: > > > > https://twitter.com/SConsProject/status/1169688929903230976?s=20 > >

Re: [Scons-dev] Twitter poll on dropping py27 support

Any voting options for non-Twitter people? On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 10:23 PM Bill Deegan wrote: > > https://twitter.com/SConsProject/status/1169688929903230976?s=20 > ___ > Scons-dev mailing list > Scons-dev@scons.org >