Hi guys,
On 09.10.2012 19:39, William Deegan wrote:
Russel,
On Oct 9, 2012, at 9:22 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
I think we have to take a vote on whether to switch the read me file at
the top of the repository hierarchy from plain text to
a) ReStructured Text, README.rst
b) Markdown, README.m
Russel,
On Oct 9, 2012, at 9:22 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
> I think we have to take a vote on whether to switch the read me file at
> the top of the repository hierarchy from plain text to
>
> a) ReStructured Text, README.rst
> b) Markdown, README.md or README.markdown
>
> I have a slight pref
@scons.org] on behalf of
Russel Winder [rus...@winder.org.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 9:22 AM
To: SCons_Developers
Subject: [Scons-dev] README in repository
I think we have to take a vote on whether to switch the read me file at
the top of the repository hierarchy from plain text to
a) Re
I think we have to take a vote on whether to switch the read me file at
the top of the repository hierarchy from plain text to
a) ReStructured Text, README.rst
b) Markdown, README.md or README.markdown
I have a slight preference fro Markdown due to the way it handles header
markup compared to ReS