Re: [Scons-dev] SCons and Python 3

I'll see if I can get a package up on sourceforge in the next day or so. Be warned it's alpha. There's still a couple unresolved regression failures. -Bill On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 4:10 AM, Tim Jenness wrote: > This is great. Sorry for the daft question, but how do I get a tar

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons and Python 3

On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 18:51 +0100, Russel Winder wrote: > On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 13:33 -0400, Bill Deegan wrote: > > Py 3.5 or 3.6? > > Excellent! > > I'm currently on Debian Sid so sadly only 3.5.3. I'll switch to > Fedora > Rawhide for tomorrow and that is 3.6.? SCons working fine using Python

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons and Python 3

This is great. Sorry for the daft question, but how do I get a tar file of the scons 3 alpha code that looks like a standard scons tar distribution? I have cloned the mercurial repo but I can’t find out in the READMEs how to go from the cloned repo to a distribution tar file. I want the tar

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons and Python 3

On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 13:33 -0400, Bill Deegan wrote: > Py 3.5 or 3.6? > Excellent! I'm currently on Debian Sid so sadly only 3.5.3. I'll switch to Fedora Rawhide for tomorrow and that is 3.6.? If you do not get bug reports from me, you know Python 3 is working fine running SCons default/tip.

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons and Python 3

Py 3.5 or 3.6? Excellent! On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Russel Winder wrote: > On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 11:35 -0400, Bill Deegan wrote: > > Remove your .sconsign file and run again. > > > > It's still on the to fix list.. > > :-) > > OK, I am now a "Using SCons with Python

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons and Python 3

On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 11:35 -0400, Bill Deegan wrote: > Remove your .sconsign file and run again. > > It's still on the to fix list.. :-) OK, I am now a "Using SCons with Python 3" person. -- Russel. = Dr Russel

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons and Python 3

Remove your .sconsign file and run again. It's still on the to fix list.. -Bill On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Russel Winder wrote: > On Mon, 2017-06-05 at 14:03 -0400, Bill Deegan wrote: > > Run --debug=stacktrace and post stacktrace? > > > scons: Reading SConscript

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons and Python 3

On Mon, 2017-06-05 at 14:03 -0400, Bill Deegan wrote: > Run --debug=stacktrace and post stacktrace? scons: Reading SConscript files ... scons: done reading SConscript files. scons: Building targets ... scons: *** [Build/UnitTests/unit-test] UnicodeDecodeError : 'ascii' codec can't decode byte

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons and Python 3

Run --debug=stacktrace and post stacktrace? On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Russel Winder wrote: > On Mon, 2017-06-05 at 17:46 +0200, Tim Jenness wrote: > > Limited network access but does your file have a BOM? If the first > > character in the file is something like

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons and Python 3

On Mon, 2017-06-05 at 17:46 +0200, Tim Jenness wrote: > Limited network access but does your file have a BOM? If the first > character in the file is something like that you can't use ascii to > read it. > First character is definitely an i as in import – well that is what od -c tells me

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons and Python 3

Limited network access but does your file have a BOM? If the first character in the file is something like that you can't use ascii to read it. Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 5, 2017, at 17:41, Russel Winder wrote: > > I updated to default/tip and tried using Python 2 –

[Scons-dev] SCons and Python 3

I updated to default/tip and tried using Python 2 – worked fine – and then Python 3: |> python3 /home/russel/Repositories/Mercurial/Forks/SCons/src/script/scons.py scons: Reading SConscript files ... scons: done reading SConscript files. scons: Building targets ... scons: *** [source/main.d]

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons and Python 3

Hi Russel, On 10.04.2016 13:10, Russel Winder wrote: The python3-port currently has: 47 test fails 108 no results [...] Sorry I didn't get much done on this over the last 12 weeks, long (and tedious) story – which no-one is interested in. you have done a lot...by starting the task and

[Scons-dev] SCons and Python 3

The python3-port currently has: 47 test fails 108 no results running the tests using Python 2.7.11 on Fedora Rawhide. The tests don't really start using Python 3.5.1 because of stuff to do with UserDict. I believe the Python 3 stuff can actually wait until the tests all pass using Python 2.

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons and Python 3

Dirk, I'll take a look at windows. It does seem a bit odd.. -Bill On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 4:12 AM, Dirk Bächle wrote: > Russel, > > On 19.12.2015 10:39, Russel Winder wrote: > >> On Wed, 2015-12-16 at 09:22 +0100, Dirk Bächle wrote: >> >>> >>> […] >> >>> @Russel: If all

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons and Python 3

Hi Russel; last time I did this it wasn't all _that_ painful. Took a few hours if I remember rightly. (Of course a lot of time has passed, but still not that much new code compared to the entire code base.) Look at the diff of the last merge before you start, to get a sense of the top two or three

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons and Python 3

Hi all, On 15.12.2015 23:07, Bill Deegan wrote: Dirk, Looks like the pull request blew up windows testing.. http://buildbot.scons.org/builders/win7-64-vs20102.7/builds/257/steps/shell/logs/stdio I fixed the problem directly on the trunk. Buildbots are still running, but it looks much

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons and Python 3

+1 for just merging the patch On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 3:36 AM, Bill Deegan wrote: > Dirk, > > I think we've given enough notice that pre 2.7 is going to be dropped. > I'll take a pass through the updated pull request (#284) and merge it, > unless someone has serious

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons and Python 3

Dirk, Looks like the pull request blew up windows testing.. http://buildbot.scons.org/builders/win7-64-vs20102.7/builds/257/steps/shell/logs/stdio Do you have access to a machine to take a look? -Bill On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 7:08 AM, William Blevins wrote: > +1 for

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons and Python 3

Bill, On 15.12.2015 23:07, Bill Deegan wrote: Dirk, Looks like the pull request blew up windows testing.. http://buildbot.scons.org/builders/win7-64-vs20102.7/builds/257/steps/shell/logs/stdio sorry for that. Do you have access to a machine to take a look? I'd have to fire up one of

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons and Python 3

Bill, On 15.12.2015 23:07, Bill Deegan wrote: Dirk, Looks like the pull request blew up windows testing.. http://buildbot.scons.org/builders/win7-64-vs20102.7/builds/257/steps/shell/logs/stdio Do you have access to a machine to take a look? just gave this another short look, and I think I

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons and Python 3

Dirk, I think we've given enough notice that pre 2.7 is going to be dropped. I'll take a pass through the updated pull request (#284) and merge it, unless someone has serious issues with doing so. -Bill On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Dirk Bächle wrote: > Hi there, > > On

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons and Python 3

Dirk is working on a pull request for pre-2.7 cleanup in the default branch. https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/pull-requests/284/code-cleanup-removed-several-pre-27 You might want to wait until after or just realize that you will need to merge again after. V/R, William On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons and Python 3

+1 on waiting for Dirks pull request to land. He has a couple items to add before it's complete. He said he'll be working on them over the weekend. Might be done by Tuesday.. -Bill On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 8:09 AM, William Blevins wrote: > Dirk is working on a pull

[Scons-dev] SCons and Python 3

I may well do a new merge of default branch into python3 branch on Tuesday next and see what the fallout is. Unless someone knows any reason why I should not or that I should delay. -- Russel. = Dr Russel Winder t:

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons and Python 3

William, Yes bitbucket pull requests are looked at. Some non-trivial ones (such as yours), require a good block of time to do a thorough review prior to merging. -Bill On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 9:16 AM, William Blevins wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Bill

[Scons-dev] SCons and Python 3

There is a flurry of activity on porting Bazaar so it run on Python 2.6+ and Python 3. There seems to be a consensus that assuming 3.4 as the base Python 3 version is a good idea. SCons already assumes Python 2.7, but is there a base bugfix version? This matters as it determines how much of

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons and Python 3

> On Sep 9, 2015, at 10:16 , Russel Winder wrote: > > There is a flurry of activity on porting Bazaar so it run on Python > 2.6+ and Python 3. There seems to be a consensus that assuming 3.4 as > the base Python 3 version is a good idea. > > SCons already assumes Python

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons and Python 3

SCons supports >=2.7 <3.0 As far as I know, the idea was to not break 2.6 if it was reasonable not to, but no guarantee. Clearly starting work on 2.7 & 3.0 compatible source code would mean 2.6 would be dropped entirely. I've not read the release notes on 2.7.*, is there some significant

[Scons-dev] SCons and Python 3

I am assuming we would be wise to merge default into python3-port to avoid things getting out of hand? -- Russel. = Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Roadm:

[Scons-dev] SCons and Python 3

The people I am currently doing a series of Python workshops for (*) are using SCons. They cannot move their Python activity from Python 2 to Python 3 because of a one version of Python rule and the fact that SCons only currently works with Python 2. I have suggested they chip in £50,000 to fund

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons and Python 3

Can you estimate the efforts that you spend porting Python 2 SConstruct to Python 3? This info IMHO is very critical for existing SCons users who are not aware of Python 2/3 portability issues. We will have to create a separate porting guide for those SCons users, who are not Python hackers like

[Scons-dev] SCons and Python 3

Is it correct that no-one has been keeping the Python 3 branch up to date with all the changes that have gone into default? -- Russel. = Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41

Re: [Scons-dev] SCons and Python 3

I plan to merge things in soon. I have some local changes already so I think I'm the best one to do it. On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Russel Winder rus...@winder.org.uk wrote: Is it correct that no-one has been keeping the Python 3 branch up to date with all the changes that have gone into