Re: [Scons-dev] Ubuntu buildbot available

Set up a matching VM and I think I've resolved all the failure by skipping most of them when tools needed are missing and in one case fixing some embedded C code which wasn't standards compliant. Please review the changes.

Re: [Scons-dev] Ubuntu buildbot available

On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 1:14 AM, Bill Deegan wrote: > At my current location the net bandwidth is very poor. > I'll see if I can find a cafe with real bandwidth to pull down the iso for > that. > Might you know if there's an AMI for EC2? I am not sure if this is what

Re: [Scons-dev] Ubuntu buildbot available

On Tue, 2016-01-12 at 23:00 +0800, Sanjeev Gupta wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Bill Deegan om> > wrote: > > > Can you pastebin a full list of packages you have installed? > > I'll build a VM and install same and see if I can replicate your > > failures > >

Re: [Scons-dev] Ubuntu buildbot available

Sanjeev, Can you pastebin a full list of packages you have installed? I'll build a VM and install same and see if I can replicate your failures and try to get rid of them and get them to skip instead. -Bill On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Bill Deegan wrote: > +1

Re: [Scons-dev] Ubuntu buildbot available

+1 on fixing tests so they don't fail because packages/tools aren't installed. For the Tex stuff I don't know which tools are needed, can someone who knows take a look? On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 4:09 AM, William Blevins wrote: > Alright, now I have 71 failing, so at least

Re: [Scons-dev] Ubuntu buildbot available

Sanjeev, You may need build-essentials to run some of the tests. Pretty sure many tests will fail/pass if there's no c/c++ compiler. You can try: python runtest.py -a -Bill On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 10:57 PM, Sanjeev Gupta wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Bill

Re: [Scons-dev] Ubuntu buildbot available

1179 tests NO RESULT from 231 echo $? 2 -- Sanjeev Gupta +65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 11:41 PM, Sanjeev Gupta wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 11:04 PM, Bill Deegan > wrote: > >> You may need

Re: [Scons-dev] Ubuntu buildbot available

can you pastbin the output from runtest? Installing a few more packages may cause less of them to get skipped.. -Bill On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Sanjeev Gupta wrote: > 1179 tests > NO RESULT from 231 > > echo $? > 2 > > > -- > Sanjeev Gupta > +65 98551208

Re: [Scons-dev] Ubuntu buildbot available

zero skipped is probably unrealistic (or impossible.. I think some may only run on windows) But minimizing the skipped is the goal. Especially if installing the required tools is fairly easy. It would be great if you captured the list of packages you installed to enable. Then I can update the

Re: [Scons-dev] Ubuntu buildbot available

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 12:40 AM, Bill Deegan wrote: > Installing a few more packages may cause less of them to get skipped.. > After installing: texlive-binaries python-dev gdc gcj-5-jdk I get: http://pastebin.com/xuuFwdTw -- Sanjeev Gupta +65 98551208

Re: [Scons-dev] Ubuntu buildbot available

Try adding: gettext-base to resolve the skipped gettext tests rpm to resolve skipped rpm tests flex to resolve lex.. I think that's all the ones I'm sure of. Dirk - Sugguestions on how to get the TEX and DocBook ones running? On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Sanjeev Gupta

Re: [Scons-dev] Ubuntu buildbot available

Hi there, On 10.01.2016 20:47, Bill Deegan wrote: Try adding: gettext-base to resolve the skipped gettext tests rpm to resolve skipped rpm tests flex to resolve lex.. I think that's all the ones I'm sure of. Dirk - Sugguestions on how to get the TEX and DocBook ones running? looks like

Re: [Scons-dev] Ubuntu buildbot available

There is some additional information here. Prefer libxml2/libxslt because lxml doesn't generate the same namespace markings. https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/wiki/DocbookTool https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/wiki/DeveloperGuide/Documentation V/R, William On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Dirk

Re: [Scons-dev] Ubuntu buildbot available

Hi Sanjeev, On 03.01.2016 17:22, Sanjeev Gupta wrote: Hi, I know of scons through the gpsd project. Would you be interested in an ubuntu-next buildbot? I run some servers and desktops updating daily from 16.04-proposed. This might be of interest because you will be able to see issues that

Re: [Scons-dev] Ubuntu buildbot available

On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 3:45 AM, Bill Deegan wrote: > Also I'm usually on the #scons on freenode.net IRC channel. > Bill, I think I just missed on IRC, the first message I saw was you leaving :-) 32-bit or 64-bit? -- Sanjeev Gupta +65 98551208

Re: [Scons-dev] Ubuntu buildbot available

On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 3:45 AM, Bill Deegan wrote: > Let me know if you need any assistance. All good. I did not use pip , installed the buildbot from the Ubuntu repository. I can see it is waiting, I assume for the next commit? It has not downloaded any source

Re: [Scons-dev] Ubuntu buildbot available

Hi, last question :-) Don't I need to install development tools? At least a bootstrap scons? Or will the build need only python2? -- Sanjeev Gupta +65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Sanjeev Gupta wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 10,

Re: [Scons-dev] Ubuntu buildbot available

On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Bill Deegan wrote: > pip is the preferred method to install buildbot slave. > Understood. I can do that, but I was trying to document what a vanilla Ubuntu would need, and how it will behave. More inline below: > On Sat, Jan 9,

Re: [Scons-dev] Ubuntu buildbot available

On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Bill Deegan wrote: > Anyway. This script: > https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/src/0d265ab5bab28eda792c24e054e4d02f24ebb338/bin/scons_dev_master.py?at=default=file-view-default > > Which you'll get in bin/scons_dev_master.py will

[Scons-dev] Ubuntu buildbot available

Hi, I know of scons through the gpsd project. Would you be interested in an ubuntu-next buildbot? I run some servers and desktops updating daily from 16.04-proposed. This might be of interest because you will be able to see issues that may surface a few months ahead. Let me know if I can