Re: [scots-l] Tuning and Electronic Tuners

2001-08-01 Thread Carla and Bob Rogers
- Original Message - From: SUZANNE MACDONALD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > tone..." I often disagree with what an electric tuner says is in tune i bought a really fancy electronic tuner to help tune whistes. i used it for my guitar one day, and my (now) wife (the violinist) says, "that second st

Re: [scots-l] Tuning and Electronic Tuners

2001-08-01 Thread John Chambers
Wendy writes: | I'm not a big fan of electronic tuners either - my favorite tuning "device" | is a tuning fork.. no batteries to run down, and no annoying little needle | jumping around alternately indicating both sharp and flat on the same string. I'm not a fan of either, though I own

Re: [scots-l] Tuning and Electronic Tuners

2001-08-01 Thread Wendy Galovich
On Wednesday 01 August 2001 20:38, you wrote: > >An electronic tuner is measuring the fundamental but > >what your ear is "measuring", hearing, on a "note" on an acoustic > >instrument is much more. > > I prefer a tuning fork (I almost wrote pitch fork by mistake!). Does the > ringing of the for

Re: [scots-l] Tuning and Electronic Tuners

2001-08-01 Thread Bob and Jay Hartman-Berrier
> >An electronic tuner is measuring the fundamental but >>what your ear is "measuring", hearing, on a "note" on an acoustic >>instrument is much more. The electronic tuner doesn't measure the fundamental based on an A440 scale - it frequency-divides based on the fundamental which it is set

Re: [scots-l] Tuning and Electronic Tuners

2001-08-01 Thread Toby Rider
On Wed, 1 Aug 2001, Kate Dunlay or David Greenberg wrote: > >An electronic tuner is measuring the fundamental but > >what your ear is "measuring", hearing, on a "note" on an acoustic > >instrument is much more. > > I prefer a tuning fork (I almost wrote pitch fork by mistake!). I

Re: [scots-l] Tuning and Electronic Tuners

2001-08-01 Thread Wendy Galovich
On Wednesday 01 August 2001 13:46, you wrote: > In an e-mail whose subject was "What makes a style Scottish?" > > Nigel Gatherer wrote: > I was also fascinated by Alexander's statement: "The ear's perception > of a note can vary so greatly that the literature uses two terms; > "frequency"...and "p

Re: [scots-l] Tuning and Electronic Tuners

2001-08-01 Thread Kate Dunlay or David Greenberg
>An electronic tuner is measuring the fundamental but >what your ear is "measuring", hearing, on a "note" on an acoustic >instrument is much more. I prefer a tuning fork (I almost wrote pitch fork by mistake!). Does the ringing of the fork include the other harmonics etc. and might that be why

Re: [scots-l] Tuning and Electronic Tuners

2001-08-01 Thread John Chambers
Alexander writes: | ... Under certain circumstances, | when two notes sounded simultaneously are only a few cycles apart, the | ear finds the result pleasing, giving a vibrato effect [sort of]. | However when this occurs, the ear's perception of the note is the | average of the two n

[scots-l] Tuning and Electronic Tuners

2001-08-01 Thread SUZANNE MACDONALD
In an e-mail whose subject was "What makes a style Scottish?" Nigel Gatherer wrote: I was also fascinated by Alexander's statement: "The ear's perception of a note can vary so greatly that the literature uses two terms; "frequency"...and "pitch"...and the two can vary by as much as a whole tone..

[scots-l] March to the battlefield

2001-08-01 Thread Philip Whittaker
I was given a copy of; Kerr's Violin Instructor and Irish Folk-Song Album Containing 158 Irish Airs Glasgow James S Kerr, Berkley Street, G3 7DX March to the Battlefield appears as tune 52. In two sharps in 2/4 time. "Tempo di marcia" The book is undated. It appears to be a modern reprint