Re: [Scratchbox-users] New releases: repackaged Codesourcery toolchains with toolchain-extras 1.0.10

2009-02-23 Thread E Robertson
Hi Jussi, I've always wonder why glibc is used in most of the toolchain and not uclibc? It seems that I'm missing something. I've used glibc and uclibc toolchains and the size comparison is pretty large, so why is their more emphasis on glibc tools? On Monday 23 February 2009 08:45:26 am Jussi H

[Scratchbox-users] New releases: repackaged Codesourcery toolchains with toolchain-extras 1.0.10

2009-02-23 Thread Jussi Hakala
New releases: = * scratchbox-toolchain-cs2007q3-glibc2.5-arm7 1.0.10-6 * scratchbox-toolchain-cs2007q3-glibc2.5-i486 1.0.10-4 * scratchbox-toolchain-arm-linux-cs2007q1-21sb1 1.0.10-1 * scratchbox-toolchain-arm-linux-cs2007q3-51sb3 1.0.10-1 * scratchbox-toolchain-arm-linux-cs2008q3-72

[Scratchbox-users] New releases: scratchbox 1.0.13, cputransp 1.0.9, apt-https 1.0.4

2009-02-23 Thread Jussi Hakala
New releases: = * scratchbox-core 1.0.13 * scratchbox-libs 1.0.13 * scratchbox-toolchain-host 1.0.13 * scratchbox-devkit-apt-https 1.0.4 * scratchbox-devkit-cputransp 1.0.9 Highlights: === * Support for sysv fakeroot on non-sbrsh targets * Additional syscalls supported for q