On Thu, 07 Dec 2000 11:30:06 -0500 "Matt Land" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>and if they decided tomorrow to
>never play another pre-HITFTBSO again, i'd be ok with it.
i sure would not be okay with it. i've never seen them. now, when they're
finally doing an european tour, they don't come to swede
ee things in life.
WD-40 to make things go,
Duct tape to make them stop,
...and a big hammer for those delicate adjustments
------
>From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [sdre-l]: Jeremy interview, and (o
I can't agree more. but in addition, I also wish they would never have rejoined at all
because I don't like what they have done since. Don't get me wrong, their music is now
is much better than most music available today, but I believe the pink album was the
best album ever made. Why would I lis
I agree with Charlie on the fact that the band should have just walked after the first
two albums and then change their name after reforming (like Slowdive did after they
broke
up. The remaining members formed Mojave 3). But as far as Nate not wanting to be with a
band that was done, finished, fi
I've actually been trying to think of this from Nate's perspective. Maybe in
his mind, the band was done, over with, finished, finito, etc. WHy try to
recapture the youthful energy and excitement they had, just let the band be,
keep it how it was, let their two albums be a nice representation o
IMHO, i don't think that they'd be so quick to let Nate back in the band. i
think that the animosity with Nate resides most in Will, and that's partly
misdirected dislike for Dave Grohl. overhearing Will talk about his Foo
experience outside their show at the Norva Theatre, Norfolk, VA this past
It seemed to me after reading the interview, that the animosity (if any
still exists) toward Nate lies elsewhere in the band. Does anyone know for
sure?
Here's the poll:
I've been on the list for a year now, and I haven't seen it yet, so if it
was done prior to my arrival, I'm sorry.
Nate wants