> > Considering the following when the same seabios code snippet:
> >
> >pci_config_writeb(0x31): bdf: 0x pam: 0x005b
> >
> > is executed to mark an pc.ram area 0xc as readonly:
> >
> > Entering vhost_begin
> > Entering vhost_region_del section: 0
On Tue, 2013-04-02 at 21:04 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-04-02 at 16:27 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 06:05:47PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2013-03-29 at 09:14 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > > > Il 29/03/2013 03:53, Nicho
On Tue, 2013-04-02 at 16:27 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 06:05:47PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-03-29 at 09:14 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > > Il 29/03/2013 03:53, Nicholas A. Bellinger ha scritto:
> > > > On Thu, 2013-03-28 at 06:13 -0400,
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 06:05:47PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-03-29 at 09:14 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > Il 29/03/2013 03:53, Nicholas A. Bellinger ha scritto:
> > > On Thu, 2013-03-28 at 06:13 -0400, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > >>> I think it's the right thing to do, but
On Fri, 2013-03-29 at 09:14 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 29/03/2013 03:53, Nicholas A. Bellinger ha scritto:
> > On Thu, 2013-03-28 at 06:13 -0400, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >>> I think it's the right thing to do, but maybe not the right place
> >>> to do this, need to reset after all IO is done,
Il 29/03/2013 03:53, Nicholas A. Bellinger ha scritto:
> On Thu, 2013-03-28 at 06:13 -0400, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> I think it's the right thing to do, but maybe not the right place
>>> to do this, need to reset after all IO is done, before
>>> ring memory is write protected.
>>
>> Our emails are
On Thu, 2013-03-28 at 11:04 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:35:42AM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-03-27 at 23:45 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2013-03-27 at 15:33 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2013-03-27
On Thu, 2013-03-28 at 06:13 -0400, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > I think it's the right thing to do, but maybe not the right place
> > to do this, need to reset after all IO is done, before
> > ring memory is write protected.
>
> Our emails are crossing each other unfortunately, but I want to
> reinfor
On Thu, 2013-03-28 at 11:03 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 28/03/2013 10:04, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> >>> > > Got ranges_overlap for vq: 0 ring_phys: 0 ring_size: 1028
> >>> > > Checking vq: 1 ring_phys: 0 ring_size: 1028 >>.
> >>> > > Got ranges_overlap for vq: 1 ring_phy
> I think it's the right thing to do, but maybe not the right place
> to do this, need to reset after all IO is done, before
> ring memory is write protected.
Our emails are crossing each other unfortunately, but I want to
reinforce this: ring memory is not write protected. Remember that
SeaBIOS
Il 28/03/2013 10:04, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
>>> > > Got ranges_overlap for vq: 0 ring_phys: 0 ring_size: 1028
>>> > > Checking vq: 1 ring_phys: 0 ring_size: 1028 >>.
>>> > > Got ranges_overlap for vq: 1 ring_phys: 0 ring_size: 1028
>>> > > Checking vq: 2 ring_phys: ed000 rin
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:35:42AM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-03-27 at 23:45 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-03-27 at 15:33 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2013-03-27 at 23:56 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 27, 201
On Wed, 2013-03-27 at 23:45 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-03-27 at 15:33 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-03-27 at 23:56 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 02:31:27PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
Adding a bit more detail
13 matches
Mail list logo
