Re: Suggestions Needed

2003-02-26 Thread theog
Actually , I am quite amazed , no one mentioned iptables on linux (http://netfilter.samba.org) , thats what I use and recommend you to use ... you can install squid (proxy) and openvpn\freeswan on another machine (if you have it) or on the same machine. T h e O g Liran Cohen -

RE: Suggestions Needed

2003-02-26 Thread chris
I'm a home user rather new to firewalls. I have a spare pc I want to use as a firewall machine for our local lan of 2 workstations w/cable modem. I'm wanting a linux/unix flavor os for the firewall system. Would I be better off using a stripped down os that is tailored for firewall machines

RE: e-mail policies

2003-02-26 Thread Michael Whang
One of the most important aspects, at least legally, is to write an acceptable use policy for corporate email and resources. Just because the resources belong to a company, one cannot automatically assume that everything an employee does is privy to the company managers and administrators.

Re: Remote access solution

2003-02-26 Thread Mike Jensen
One thing to keep in mind when using VNC is that even though the inital authentication may be secure, anything you type while controlling the computer is sent in plain text. So, if you were to connect to a windows machine, for example, then login to or unlock the screen on that machine , that

RE: Suggestions Needed

2003-02-26 Thread Craig Searle
It really is a matter of personal preference- if you already have other *nix systems, then maybe you will want to use a firewall distro. If not then perhaps you could use RedHat (a stripped-down version) with some hardening (bastille) and a good iptables script (MonMotha)that way you could

RE: Remote access solution

2003-02-26 Thread Michael Whang
VNC is a great tool for remote administration, if you know its strengths and weaknesses. Unfortunately, not every company has unlimited IT resources available to implement the best remote admin tools...not mention the usual hassle of getting your manager's approval for purchases. Just saying a

Re: e-mail policies

2003-02-26 Thread mweatherford
Pablo, Chris's comments are right on the mark. If the policy is loosley defined or open to interpretation, guess what...it will be impossible to enforce. No one wants to appear too autocratic but if you have a strict policy, it will keep those employees with a tendency to fly to close to the

RE: e-mail policies

2003-02-26 Thread Mark Reardon
The first item to consider is the local legal requirements. I work with an industry ISAC in the U.S. and we have Canadian members. In our discussions the laws of Canada are much different then the U.S. They also have local laws to comply with. Another item is that asserting ownership of

RE: Remote access solution

2003-02-26 Thread James Butcher
VNC can also be tunneled through ssh, theres plenty of how-tos around on google, and one its setup along with other mesures is as secure as other remote desktop programs. -Original Message- From: Chris Berry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 February 2003 19:45 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

ntpasswd compatibility w/RAID systems

2003-02-26 Thread David Moisan
At 02:49 PM 2/25/2003 +, Trevor Cushen wrote: Another method worth being aware of is this little beauty http://home.eunet.no/~pnordahl/ntpasswd/ I'm not sure what scenerio you would use this in a far as forensics is involved but a handy tool in any arsenal. No good on raided system What type

Download Managers

2003-02-26 Thread Leon Pholi
Hi, Just wondering on thoughts about download managers- do they pose are security risk? Any known to be trojaned? The one I use is GetRight, does anyone know if this one has known security issues? Any thoughts appreciated, thanks. Leon

Re: Suggestions Needed

2003-02-26 Thread Leo Security
Go to sourceforge.net and search for Firewall floppy. You will get lots of already stripped down versions. You can run these firewalls from a floppy and also from a hard drive if you want to enable logging. Leo Justyn wrote: I'm a home user rather new to firewalls. I have a spare pc I want to

Re: Permissions scanner

2003-02-26 Thread Harvey Cary
A key element to this is that a user will be granted the least security possible when the share and NTFS permissions are combined. For example, if the NTFS permissions give a user read access but the shared permission is read/write for everyone the user will still only have read access. I

RE: Suggestions Needed

2003-02-26 Thread Mike Powell
Smoothwall is a tailored installation of Linux. It isn't designed to install over an existing installation of Red Hat or any other distro. - download the .iso from your nearest mirror (http://us0.download.smoothwall.org/?2/1.0/iso/), burn it to a CD and trial it on an available Intel based PC. It

RE: e-mail policies

2003-02-26 Thread Bruce Fowler
I am sure most of you would concede that preventing employees from utilising information systems resources from any form of private use is impossible, if not impractical (having arrived at the office on a Saturday morning only to find an employee printing full colour A3 posters for their kid's

RE: Suggestions Needed

2003-02-26 Thread Brent Gardner
I would recommend a stripped-down OS that lets you build up to what you need rather than try to strip down a standard *nix distro. There's too much you might miss these days. I like the Linux Embedded Application Firewall, available at leaf.sourceforge.net. Distros are available that include a

RE: tools used to examine a computer

2003-02-26 Thread David Moisan
At 12:14 PM 2/24/2003 +, Trevor Cushen wrote: Go to www.sysinternals.com and get the Unix Utils which will include dd and netcat for Windows Both will fit on a floppy. I couldn't find those tools on the sysinternals site, but I did find an NT port of dd at unixutils.sourceforge.net. Doesn't

RE: e-mail policies

2003-02-26 Thread Bram Van Dam
At 10:15 25/02/2003, chris wrote: Dear gurus We are defining policies for the use of corporate e-mail, I have doubts about privacy of messages sent by employees. Since the e-mail system is intended for business use, we need to prevent sensitive information disclosure. If we respect the

Re: Comparing Windows Bastions to Linux Bastions

2003-02-26 Thread Chris Travers
Hi Gregory; The O'Reilly book Building Internet Firewalls has a good section on Windows and *nix bastions. My own perspective is that Windows hosts tend to be more complicated from a security perspective because of hidden dependencies, etc (for example does your web app require COM+? How

RE: Wireless Blackberry

2003-02-26 Thread Parisi, Robert
i would still worry. highly unlikely that the service goes away--might just a different manufacturer. Regards, Bob Parisi Robert A. Parisi, Jr. Senior Vice President and Chief Underwriting Officer AIG eBusiness Risk Solutions 80 Pine Street, 8th Floor NYC, NY 10005 Phone: 212-770-1691

Re: Download Managers

2003-02-26 Thread Corey Schaffer
Depending on which version you are usingthere may very well be spyware involved. Corey On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 11:11:04 +1100, Leon Pholi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Just wondering on thoughts about download managers-do they pose are security risk? Any known to be trojaned? The one I use is

RE: Wireless Blackberry

2003-02-26 Thread Michael Parker
Try this article... http://www.mobileinfo.com/News_2002/Issue45/RIM_loss_NTP.htm regards, Michael -Original Message- From: Parisi, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: February 26, 2003 12:22 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; Moeckel, Sharon Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Wireless

Re: Remote access solution

2003-02-26 Thread Chris Berry
From: Mike Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] One thing to keep in mind when using VNC is that even though the inital authentication may be secure, anything you type while controlling the computer is sent in plain text. So, if you were to connect to a windows machine, for example, then login to or

Re: Download Managers

2003-02-26 Thread SMiller
If nothing else. I would strongly suggest that you use Ad-Aware or equivalent scanner to determine if such a product is adware/spyware, partcularly if the DM is free. Several years ago I used Gozilla! only to find that it was calling home on a regular basis...

Policy Manual

2003-02-26 Thread Chris Berry
Prior to my taking over here the previous admin had not bothered to write any policy. To try and increase professionalism and to get up to speed with HIPPA compliance I'm putting together a policy and proceedures manual. Here is a list of some of the documents I'm going to put together:

RE: e-mail policies

2003-02-26 Thread SMiller
Caveat: I'm neither a guru nor a lawyer, nor do I appear on a reality TV show purporting to be either. I'm in this thread late, so I am commenting on more than the text of this message. I hope that is alright. Someone posted that the first thing to do is do determine the local legal requirements.

Re: Remote access solution

2003-02-26 Thread Chris Berry
From: Mike Dresser [EMAIL PROTECTED] As well, you can limit who can connect to the system by allowing only certain IP's to connect. Hey, that's cool, how do you do that? Chris Berry [EMAIL PROTECTED] Systems Administrator JM Associates Linux and I have a love/hate relationship. I hate its

RE: e-mail policies

2003-02-26 Thread Mark Burgess
Isn't all discipline selective? Upper levels of management don't come under the same scrutiny and rules that the lower levels are required to live under. The VPs won't be fired for chatting with their kids at college using IM though they would drop one of their underlings in a heartbeat for the

Re: [OCLUG] Policy Manual

2003-02-26 Thread Gene Yoo
Chris Berry wrote: Prior to my taking over here the previous admin had not bothered to write any policy. To try and increase professionalism and to get up to speed with HIPPA compliance I'm putting together a policy and proceedures manual. Here is a list of some of the documents I'm going to

RE: e-mail policies

2003-02-26 Thread Joe Martinez
Sequel Technology offers a product for Internet Resource Management. http://www.sequeltech.com If anyone is interested... Joe Martinez Director of Information Technology Services -Original Message- From: Bruce Fowler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 3:34 PM