RE: Passwords On Paper

2001-12-21 Thread Christopher Vittek
Use tampered Proof envelopes Chris -Original Message- From: Bonner, Jon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 6:04 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Passwords On Paper How do you ensure that it is the proper envelope? What I mean is, what's to stop someone

RE: Single Sign On Software and One Time Password

2001-11-20 Thread Christopher Vittek
So is Entrust and RSA I believe. They have CryptoAPI compatability also. Chris -Original Message- From: I. Brugman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2001 5:37 PM To: leon; 'eko yulianto'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Single Sign On Software and One Time Password

RE: SNMP security

2001-11-19 Thread Christopher Vittek
Not to agree to have SNMP turned on, I would always turn it off. But, in some large companies that I have noticed is that they use HP Openview. HP Openview uses SNMP for various things. In turn, it does not have to be there, but politics sometimes get the better and you need to find a way to a

RE: What firewall?

2001-11-18 Thread Christopher Vittek
my previous message was talking about. Chris -Original Message- From: Glenn Pitcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 6:08 PM To: 'Christopher Vittek'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: What firewall? I don't quite understand whe

RE: securing icmp protocol

2001-11-18 Thread Christopher Vittek
There is not alot of information as to why you would not just take ICMP completly off the network. But this might help. If you have something like a Checkpoint Firewall for example on a gateway, The firewall can actually read into the packets and allow ICMP while disallowing redirects. Checkpoin

RE: SNMP security

2001-11-18 Thread Christopher Vittek
chris -Original Message- From: Robert D. Hughes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 4:37 PM To: Christopher Vittek; JC; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: SNMP security -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 True, but only if you're running a firewall that

RE: SNMP security

2001-11-18 Thread Christopher Vittek
I dont if this would tie in. If you have a firewall you can secure SNMP a little more by allowing the firewall to do Application Level securing and allow SNMP gets while disallowing sets. This might help in securing SNMP a little more. Chris -Original Message- From: Robert D. Hughes [ma

RE: SNMP security

2001-11-18 Thread Christopher Vittek
I dont if this would tie in. If you have a firewall you can secure SNMP a little more by allowing the firewall to do Application Level securing and allow SNMP gets while disallowing sets. This might help in securing SNMP a little more. Chris -Original Message- From: Robert D. Hughes [ma

RE: securing icmp protocol

2001-11-18 Thread Christopher Vittek
There is not alot of information as to why you would not just take ICMP completly off the network. But this might help. If you have something like a Checkpoint Firewall for example on a gateway, The firewall can actually read into the packets and allow ICMP while disallowing redirects. Checkpoin

RE: What firewall?

2001-11-18 Thread Christopher Vittek
The only problem I see with this is that this would do good for just packet filtering at the network level. It would be great for functionality and expanability, but for secure, not that good. You need a firewall that can do data filtering as well. Also that the firewall can be between the data