I like to place one dmz in my net but my boss like an arguments for
this...
I find in the net why dmz is better than a simple firewall?
but not found nothing concrete to display to my boss
About any basic administration book will tell you the purpose of DMZs. You
can't interchange the terms
I really hate statistics. I'd now like to see those numbers
cross-referenced with the number (probably estimated) of developers and the
number (another approximation) of users for each. I'm also curious as to if
on the older packages, if they've found all there is, or if people just
stopped
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I think one important thing that was only brushed over, is the fact that
this is one weapon, in a huge line of aresenal that an administrator can try
and use to keep their site secure. It is NOT the cure-all solution for
security, I think we've
http://www.attrition.org/attrition/how-apache.html
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/mod/core.html#servertokens
You can look at those and figure it out. BTW, this has been on the security
focus mailing lists for a long, long time, you may want to search the
mailing list archive before posting.
Mike
First of all, download it from:
http://www.atstake.com/research/tools/index.html#network_utilities
and for learning how to use it, I'm sure you can search the web,
www.google.com. There is also a book called Hacking Linux Exposed the
covers just a few of the uses of it.
That should be enough
Let me clear a couple quick things up here.
-Original Message-
From: Ben McGinnes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 6:26 PM
To: TERRA209792
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Encrypting e-mail
TERRA209792([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Fri, May 17, 2002 at 12:18:47AM
I'm not too familiar with NT's SMTP server, but I know on all the unix based
SMTP servers I run, you can change the SMTP name and version number. You
might want to double check to see if you can do the same with NT's SMTP
server.
Thanks
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Ben Zino
As much as I dislike Sendmail, the current version is secure I guess they
haven't found any major security flaws with it *yet*. I hate sendmail, and
its track record is less than impressive. But Sendmail is/has set the
standard in SMTP, so you do have to give it that.
Thanks
Mike
The most secure way of doing this, would probably be using VNC through a
SSH tunnel. That is generally accepted as being secure.
Thanks
Mike
At 03:55 PM 4/24/2002 -0400, Chris Santerre wrote:
I use VNC here as well. However i would not call it secure. I have heard of
people using it over a
I really dislike the term out-of-box security. If you're an admin, or
even a buyer of a system, out-of-box security really has little or no
relevance at all. I really don't think of security in degrees, or as a
rating from 1-10, it is either secure or not secure, and if is currently
secure,
If you're using linux, its in the GNU textutils package.
At 08:45 AM 3/27/2002 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think that it is very important, and that you should consider talking to
a lawyer the specializes in that area.
At 04:25 PM 3/25/2002 -0300, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 08:58 AM 3/21/2002 -0800, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Check out www.pgp.com
Quote from www.pgp.com
Network Associates recently announced the closure of PGP
Security business unit and the integration of some of its product into
other business units. PGP
13 matches
Mail list logo
