(ZDNET) - If you spend more on coffee than you spend on IT security, then
you will be hacked. What's more, you deserve to be hacked. - Richard Clarke,
special adviser to the president on cyberspace security.
You will find 90% of everything in the corporate world is about ego. That's
an old argument I'm not going into here. Time is money == insecurity. I
seriously wonder what has to happen before we security heads are listened to
on many of the problems that plague us.
There's no way to know if
the real hackers need
little sites to bounce off at the least. They TOO use these bulk scanners for
such things at times I'm sure.
I know for myself, if I really want to know the basics about a system I use
this: http://ar.com.au/~thefinn/hv.c
Perhaps it's better to be secure AND obscure.
Bored
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Sat, 4 May 2002 05:27, you wrote:
Hi,
Anyone know a shell (for linux) more secure or whit more security rules
better than bash or rbash?
Thanks in advanced
Matias
bash + bofh patches. (there's tcsh bofh too) Best I know of.
If you want SHELL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Sat, 4 May 2002 21:02, you wrote:
Please, tell me more about this kernel patch : )
Why I try to do? for example:
log the .bash_history in real time (no buffered), and push this to a
socket.
I've lost the url for the patches for bash and tcsh. I do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002 16:28, you wrote:
Hello everyone!
I just noticed from out router logs that scans for the ftp port increases
these days. Now i´ve heard that this has something to do with somewhat
Wu-FTPD autorooter autowu v.10. i didnt find it on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 03:07, you wrote:
TheFinn wrote:
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002 07:11, you wrote:
I disagree, have a look at one of the latest TESO exploits:
[...]
So, if you can obscure your version numbers this baby don't work. Merely
one example.
I
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002 07:11, you wrote:
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, TheFinn wrote:
Anyone know of an easy/fast way to stop apache from spilling its' guts
when it gets scanned?
Here's some scanner output: Apache/1.3.12 (Unix) (Red Hat/Linux)
mod_ssl/2.6.6 OpenSSL/0.9.6 PHP/3.0.15 mod_perl/1.21
that.
thanks
TheFinn.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8
iQEVAwUBPL0CeFcLqEBr4wHHAQGrBAgAkcCkfTvhdFg85mIt1hiTaPwNhhFWSEkf
wpgP0FAtM9p8vL6NWTZhcVcdcg3c1ZS3IepqR9OUa8DmJmGzP6nlXMr9csYqVUHD
zGKI5yb0Wm7SEHndmimdXQqdnnDt2pUw9TMaD9y3bYVqQT73vb1uh960ryB8wPTN
