Hi,
Good points about the Cisco 3000 VPN Concentrator. One thing that bears
mentioning about the *firewall* is that the VPN3K does basic NAT/Port
Filtering. Hardly, imho, a *robust* firewall solution...but it's all
about risk vs. hassle/headaches.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/
Hi Mario,
I expect that that the company whant to use WEP Encryption(better than
nothing but not a strong encryption) and or LEAP Authentication for that
reason Cisco Secure ACS is needed.
If you need to have more security as with WEP Encryption you can build an
overlay VPN with VPN Clients on
either is good
but ACS is cheeper
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 11:13 AM
Subject: Cisco Secure ACS vs. Firewall
Hi List
we are going to setup a WLAN in a warehouse to enable the forklifters to
comm
Hallo [EMAIL PROTECTED],
am Mittwoch, 23. Oktober 2002 um 11:13:36 schrieben Sie:
> Hi List
> we are going to setup a WLAN in a warehouse to enable the forklifters to
> communicate with with the warehouse management (WM) system. The company,
> which will install all the equipment suggested to set
You could do both, but at least do the ACS. The firewall will
block traffic you designate, but it won't (unless it contains
capability of doing so beyond most firewalls) authenticate the
wireless users. ACS will perform the AAA - authenticating,
authorizing, and accounting - to verify those c
this helps.
Earl Ogden
Network Specialist
Regional Training Institute
Cell #: 925-382-3048
Office #: 925-930-8366 xt 8209
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:mario.walter@;bluewin.ch]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cisco Sec
Hi List
we are going to setup a WLAN in a warehouse to enable the forklifters to
communicate with with the warehouse management (WM) system. The company,
which will install all the equipment suggested to setup a Cisco Secure ACS
for security reasons. However, I would prefer the installation of a f
