RE: POP3

Sorry, he did change web hosting: Here is the new address: http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ - Chris Payne On Sun, 03 Mar 2002 09:16:41 -0300, irado furioso com tudo wrote: the informed (below) url is dead. Any other with similar sanitizer's?? :original message Subject: RE: POP3 Date

RE: POP3

My users want me to to give them POP3 access via the firewall. We have an Exchange Server runnig with a Checkpoint Firewall. Are there any security issues that I need to watch out Doesnt Exchange support spop? (SSL layer on pop3), or APOP? //HÅkan

RE: POP3

code before it can do damage... Just some thoughts... gm... -Original Message- From: Burleson, Lee (IA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 11:18 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: POP3 Take the following into consideration

RE: POP3

the informed (below) url is dead. Any other with similar sanitizer's?? :original message Subject: RE: POP3 Date: Wed, 27 Feb 02 11:23:33 We have removed our previous mail server and have installed a Sendmail/Qpopper *nix server running John D Hardin's procmail sanitizer to block certain

Re: POP3

On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 10:00:27PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My users want me to to give them POP3 access via the firewall. We have an Exchange Server runnig with a Checkpoint Firewall. Are there any security issues that I need to watch out Yes: Never run any Daemons/Servers on

RE: POP3

: Ferguson, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 1:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: POP3 we took pop3 away from our users not long ago due to virus concerns, technically the desktop software will scan attachments/emails if configured properly

RE: POP3

We have removed our previous mail server and have installed a Sendmail/Qpopper *nix server running John D Hardin's procmail sanitizer to block certain content and many many types of file attachement. http://www.wolfenet.com/~jhardin/ Viruses have dropped by 99%. Removing access to HOTMAIL

RE: POP3

to worry about scanning at the server. - -t - -Original Message- From: Ferguson, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 12:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: POP3 we took pop3 away from our users not long ago due to virus concerns

RE: POP3

we took pop3 away from our users not long ago due to virus concerns, technically the desktop software will scan attachments/emails if configured properly, but we like to control the specific types of attachments they can/cannot receive and scan all mail at the server level first -Original

Re: POP3

At 22:00 23.02.02 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My users want me to to give them POP3 access via the firewall. We have an Exchange Server runnig with a Checkpoint Firewall. Are there any security issues that I need to watch out I'm not an expert in Checkpoint Firewalls, but the problem is,

Re: POP3

Gauntlet FW discourages POP3 since contnet scanning for incoming mails is not supported by their POP3 proxy. You need to know whether content scanning(among other risks) is possible for POP3 access via Checkpoint. - Kani On 23 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My users want me to to