On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 09:48:05AM -0700, Chisholm Wildermuth wrote:
> We have circumvented the flaws in wireless security by this process:
> [ MAC addr ACLs, cloaked ESSID, WEP, VPN ]
Of those measures, the VPN is the one on which your security hangs.
- MAC addrs are broadcast in the clear; som
My point wasn't that it can't be secure, not at all.
I just wanted to point out that of the security measures, the only one I think
really offers stiff protection is the VPN; the others are all too easily
compromised. It doesn't require a cryptanalytic wizard to install Kismet and
Airsnort. ACL,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Wireless Technology (can it be secured and how)
Sure, anything can be secured, easily.
For wireless, there's two reasonable choices. Maybe even three.
(1) You can run your entire net, including all endpoints and all the
gear in the middle, inside suitable RF s
Original Message-
From: Bennett Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:58 AM
To: Chisholm Wildermuth
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Wireless Technology (can it be secured and how)
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 09:48:05AM -0700, Chisholm Wildermuth wrote:
> We have ci
Sure, anything can be secured, easily.
For wireless, there's two reasonable choices. Maybe even three.
(1) You can run your entire net, including all endpoints and all the
gear in the middle, inside suitable RF shielding to prevent
anyone else from being able to interact with it. Build a
The subject speaks for itself. I have covered the following
documentation:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/so/cuso/epso/sqfr/safwl_wp.htm
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/witc/ao350ap/prodlit/a350w_ov.htm
http://rr.sans.org/wireless/limits.php
http://rr.sans.org/wireless/netsec.p