RE: nmap-spoofing-question

2001-09-25 Thread Gaziel, Avishay
; Gaziel - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: ?? 17 ?? 2001 18:15? To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: nmap-spoofing-question > when you include spoofed addresses you should include a real ip > address that you want a r

Re: nmap-spoofing-question

2001-09-20 Thread didldadl
When using this command, the IP snort spits out is always the one given with "-S", but in the /var/log/messages i can see a lookup for the real IP of the machine which is doing the scan. So I don't really believe, that it's binding another one. I tried to have a closer look in the headers with sno

Re: nmap-spoofing-question

2001-09-19 Thread TD - Sales International Holland B.V.
Perhaps it binds another IP to the card if you use those 2 options. In linux (dunno about windows) it's very easy to have 1 ethernetcard listen to more than 1 ip address. If you use that option try to see if the box responds to the IP you gave by pinging it. (BTW it says YOUR IP so you're NOT

RE: nmap-spoofing-question

2001-09-19 Thread carbon
s. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2001 3:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: nmap-spoofing-question Hi all. I hope anybody can help me with this little question. How is it possible to get the scanning-results with nmap, wh

Re: nmap-spoofing-question

2001-09-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
September 16, 2001 12:23 AM Subject: nmap-spoofing-question > Hi all. > > I hope anybody can help me with this little question. How is it possible to get > the scanning-results with nmap, when I spoof the address? I thought, that if a > computer gets a syn-packet or whatever, it

RE: nmap-spoofing-question

2001-09-18 Thread didldadl
> when you include spoofed addresses you should include a real ip address that > you want a reply to come back to. man nmap for more information about using > the decoy option. Hmm. That's clear, but why does the "-S"-option work? When I use this option together with the "-e" I get back the resu

RE: nmap-spoofing-question

2001-09-18 Thread Baker, Thomas
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2001 10:24 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: nmap-spoofing-question Hi all. I hope anybody can help me with this little question. How is it possible to get the scanning-results with nmap, when I spoof the address? I thought

Re: nmap-spoofing-question

2001-09-18 Thread b. mac
i think youre referring to nmap's decoy option (-D). true, you will only receive the packets destined for your ip. but your ip _and_ the decoy ip/ip's you provided show up in a log file, instead of _just_ your ip. this makes it more difficult for someone examining a log file to tell where the s

RE: nmap-spoofing-question

2001-09-18 Thread didldadl
Hi. All my apologies to the people who have spent their time answering my question. I've asked my question not precisely enough... (uuhm... oops) What I really meant were the options "-S" and "-e". Why do I get answers from machines I've scanned when using these options? Is my real IP-address inc

nmap-spoofing-question

2001-09-17 Thread didldadl
Hi all. I hope anybody can help me with this little question. How is it possible to get the scanning-results with nmap, when I spoof the address? I thought, that if a computer gets a syn-packet or whatever, it sends its syn-ack or whatever back to the ip which sent the syn or any other kind of pa