The following bug and source code [1] are present in OpenSSL:
http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=1929
I think something similar could be done in the JDK, by making some tweaks to
the SocketOptions classes to expose some more options. I'm pretty sure
something relating to this will wor
On Mar 22, 7:38am, xuelei@oracle.com (Xuelei Fan) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: Review Request of JDK Enhancement Proposal: DTLS
| Networking experts, any suggestion?
I have not seen pmtu exposed at the application layer before. Has anyone
else?
christos
|
| Xuelei
|
| On 3/21/2014 8:28 AM, Mat
Networking experts, any suggestion?
Xuelei
On 3/21/2014 8:28 AM, Matthew Hall wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 06:58:50AM +0800, Xuelei Fan wrote:
>> here. Although MTU is not PMTU, but it is normally "correct".
>
> I would state, not "normally correct", but "frequently correct".
>
> In case of
Max,
Thanks a lot for the review, please find comments in line.
Webrev updated: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~valeriep/8031003/webrev.01
On 03/17/14 01:47, Wang Weijun wrote:
NativeUtil.h:
88: How about puts(s) or printf("%s", s) (in case s includes "%")?
Sure.
NativeUtil.c:
514-516: not nece
- Original Message -
> On 02/04/2014 04:48 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>
> > As has already been mentioned on this thread, libraries should have their
> > version increased when the ABI changes. Thus, a libpcsclite.so.2 or later
> > would indicate a different ABI to what the JDK PCSC code w
