Can you elaborate on 'this and a couple of other patches' - is that supposed to
be all of the corresponding JEP 130? Some part of it?
Considering that the JEP 130 has legal and docs implications that imply more
work having to be done than just back porting a couple of change sets, I think
you
Hi Mala, the backport looks good to me. Only one nit: I think the
comment "no crls provided" in X509Factory.java:461 should be removed
since you have the corrected comment in there.
For what it's worth I'm not an approved reviewer on the census yet so
you might need someone else to give the o
- Original Message -
> Considering that the issue was a P3 RFE rather than a high priority bug fix,
> it's not clear to me why it would be necessary to backport it into 7u80, at
> the end point in the release cycle.
>
I don't have anything to do with the assignment of such priorities.
>
Hi Brad,
Thanks for looking into this. Here's updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~plevart/jdk9-dev/FileInputStreamPool.8047769/webrev.02/
...and answers are inline...
On 12/23/2014 02:30 AM, Bradford Wetmore wrote:
Hi Peter,
Looks like you have a committer status, will you be pushin
