On 6/6/2017 6:03 PM, Anthony Scarpino wrote:
On 06/06/2017 04:04 PM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
New webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xuelei/8178728/webrev.01/
On 6/6/2017 1:45 PM, Anthony Scarpino wrote:
On 06/05/2017 02:15 PM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
Hi,
Please review the JDK 10 update:
http://
On 06/07/2017 09:14 AM, sha.ji...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Sean,
On 07/06/2017 04:27, Sean Mullan wrote:
Hi John,
This looks like a very useful test. I have not gone through all of the
code, but here are a few comments for now until I have more time:
- add tests for EC keys
- add tests for SH
Hi Sean,
On 07/06/2017 04:27, Sean Mullan wrote:
Hi John,
This looks like a very useful test. I have not gone through all of the
code, but here are a few comments for now until I have more time:
- add tests for EC keys
- add tests for SHA-512 variants of the signature algorithms
- add tests
On 06/06/2017 04:04 PM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
New webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xuelei/8178728/webrev.01/
On 6/6/2017 1:45 PM, Anthony Scarpino wrote:
On 06/05/2017 02:15 PM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
Hi,
Please review the JDK 10 update:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xuelei/8178728/webrev.00/
New webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xuelei/8178728/webrev.01/
On 6/6/2017 1:45 PM, Anthony Scarpino wrote:
On 06/05/2017 02:15 PM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
Hi,
Please review the JDK 10 update:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xuelei/8178728/webrev.00/
This update extends the DisabledAlgorithmC
Looks fine to me.
Thanks,
Valerie
On 6/5/2017 2:15 PM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
Hi,
Please review the JDK 10 update:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xuelei/8178728/webrev.00/
This update extends the DisabledAlgorithmConstraints implementation by
checking the AlgorithmParameters, which is ignored at
On 06/05/2017 02:15 PM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
Hi,
Please review the JDK 10 update:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xuelei/8178728/webrev.00/
This update extends the DisabledAlgorithmConstraints implementation by
checking the AlgorithmParameters, which is ignored at present.
Thanks,
Xuelei
I'm fi
Hi John,
This looks like a very useful test. I have not gone through all of the
code, but here are a few comments for now until I have more time:
- add tests for EC keys
- add tests for SHA-512 variants of the signature algorithms
- add tests for larger key sizes (ex: 2048 for DSA/RSA)
- you c
On 06/06/2017 16:28, Xuelei Fan wrote:
Looks fine to me.
There is no clear reason why Paths.get(uri).toFile().getParentFile()
works but not File(uri).getParentFile(). Would you mind add a comment
so that the code will not modified back to use File(uri) later?
Thanks for review. It seems to
Looks fine to me.
There is no clear reason why Paths.get(uri).toFile().getParentFile()
works but not File(uri).getParentFile(). Would you mind add a comment
so that the code will not modified back to use File(uri) later?
Thanks,
Xuelei
On 6/6/2017 1:40 AM, Seán Coffey wrote:
ping. Can I ge
ping. Can I get a review for this please ?
regards,
Sean.
On 01/06/2017 17:23, Seán Coffey wrote:
The recent JDK-8163528 fix caused a regression for JDK binaries
launched with a UNC pathname. We can use the Paths class to create the
required File. I managed to put a test together which shoul
Please update the copyright year. Otherwise, looks fine to me.
Xuelei
On 6/5/2017 10:53 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
Please take a review on this change:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8181461/webrev.00/
This is a test bug and the fix is simply:
// 1. Default policy is tryLast
.
12 matches
Mail list logo