It looks good!
With kind regards,
Ivan
On 3/6/18 6:19 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
Please take a review at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8199198/webrev.00
I just removed the 3 unused functions. They were there from the beginning
(2005) but had never existed in any Java class.
Thanks
Please take a review at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8199198/webrev.00
I just removed the 3 unused functions. They were there from the beginning
(2005) but had never existed in any Java class.
Thanks
Max
> On Mar 6, 2018, at 11:46 PM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
>
> Looks fine to me.
>
> On 3/6/2018 6:36 AM, Weijun Wang wrote:
>> Please take a review at
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8198898/webrev.00/
>> Two notes:
>> 1. In fact, I am not able to build now because there
Please take a review at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8199154/webrev.00/
In LdapLoginModule.java, there seems to be an erroneous DL inside DL. I removed
the outer DL and its incomplete DD. There is no visual difference after the
change.
In Krb5LoginModule.java, there were only DDs and
Hello!
The regression test SignatureLength.java was seen to fail on some
Solaris systems.
This is because signature verifier from SunPKCS11-Solaris provider
doesn't always throw SignatureException when the signature is of wrong
length, but can simply return false to indicate it is invalid.
Thanks for pointing out where the review was, I don't check the update
email list as often.
Reviewed in jdk8u-dev. Looks good.
Brad
On 3/6/2018 1:03 AM, Seán Coffey wrote:
Thanks Brad - yes, this review is for JDK 11 (jdk/jdk).
I've another review request open for you in order to handle
Looks fine to me.
On 3/6/2018 6:36 AM, Weijun Wang wrote:
Please take a review at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8198898/webrev.00/
Two notes:
1. In fact, I am not able to build now because there are other codes not
compiling with VS 2017 and they fail before security.cpp is
Please take a review at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8198898/webrev.00/
Two notes:
1. In fact, I am not able to build now because there are other codes not
compiling with VS 2017 and they fail before security.cpp is compiled. I just
installed VS 2017 locally, extracted the command
Thanks Brad - yes, this review is for JDK 11 (jdk/jdk).
I've another review request open for you in order to handle the
jdk8u-dev edit :
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2018-March/007284.html
regards,
Sean.
On 05/03/2018 23:41, Brad Wetmore wrote:
Looks good.
This looks