I was just wondering, could we just simplify the implementation by using
two named groups for the top two-preferred categories, without limited
to XDH and ECDHE? For example, if FFDHE is on the top 2, FFDHE will be
used as well. Normally, XDH and ECDHE will be used, but the simplifying
is a l
Hi Scott,
Thanks for the feedback. May I have more information if there is a real
project/requirement for the use_srtp extension? As would help me plan
for the priority for the support.
I'm thinking about to support more flexible extension customization, but
for now it is not easy to add
Yes, I think I could restructure this to support that approach. You're
right in that FFDHE gets the short end of the stick in the current
scheme unless it's the only type in the namedGroups property and even
then it takes the longest in terms of time. I'll restructure this and
issue a new webre
Hi All,
This is a new test int the area of jarsigner and keytool for the
restricted/disabled algorithms.
Bug Id - https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8248745
Webrev - http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~akolarkunnu/8248745/webrev.00/
Description:
Adding a test for key generation, jar signing a
Hi Xuelei, I've updated the webrev based on your suggestion. It
actually made the logic a lot simpler so that was a good suggestion for
sure.
I also added a couple additional tests in ClientHelloKeyShares.java to
cover a few different namedGroup orderings.
https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jnime
My goal is implementing a server that can stream video to a browser using the
WebRTC standard. WebRTC has good browser support and requires only a few lines
of JavaScript code on the client side making it an ideal means to send
low-latency video. It has many advantages over other mechanisms like
Hi Jamil,
Thanks for taking the comment. The webrev looks good to me. Just a
few trivial comments about the coding style. No more code review is
required to me.
-for (NamedGroup ng : namedGroups) {
+while(ngTypes.size() < 2 && ngIter.hasNext()) {
I prefer to use for-each as it h
Hi Scott,
Thank you very much for the feedback. I filed a feature request:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8250643. Please keep track of
the status.
Thanks,
Xuelei
On 7/27/2020 1:24 PM, Scott Palmer wrote:
My goal is implementing a server that can stream video to a browser using
All taken care of.
https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jnimeh/reviews/8247630/webrev.03/
--Jamil
On 7/27/20 1:58 PM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
Hi Jamil,
Thanks for taking the comment. The webrev looks good to me. Just a
few trivial comments about the coding style. No more code review is
required to me.
Looks good to me. Thanks!
Xuelei
On 7/27/2020 4:03 PM, Jamil Nimeh wrote:
All taken care of.
https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jnimeh/reviews/8247630/webrev.03/
--Jamil
On 7/27/20 1:58 PM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
Hi Jamil,
Thanks for taking the comment. The webrev looks good to me. Just a
few triv
10 matches
Mail list logo
