Thanks for the review~
Well, as for allowing the missing options, I am not sure how useful or
how frequently people use them. As for me, I find them a bit too
ambiguous to my liking. I think there are other more useful bugs to fix
than spending time on this. So far, no bug report regarding sup
I think this is ok.
I have a recollection our Cipher.getInstance() provider selection
mechanism (getTransforms()) allows for missing options:
"AES//NoPadding" "AES/ECB/" But it's been a while since I've looked at
this. These ucrypto values look like they must be completely specified.
Is t
Hi, Brad,
Can you please review this straightforward Ucrypto fix? This is about
adding aliases to the AES and RSA ciphers of OracleUcrypto provider.
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~valeriep/8043349/webrev.00/
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8043349
Thanks,
Valerie
