Re: Code Review Request: 8025763

2013-12-02 Thread Mike Duigou
The missing @since for overridden methods and missing @throws for unchecked exceptions is a known javadoc behaviour. Apparently there's some disagreement as to whether it is a bug but I encourage you to add the tags. Mike On Nov 27 2013, at 12:55 , Bradford Wetmore wrote: > Sean wrote: > >

Re: Code Review Request: 8025763

2013-11-27 Thread Bradford Wetmore
Sean wrote: > That kind of seems like a javadoc bug to me. Shouldn't it add the > @since tag as part of inheriting the javadoc? On the chance that this is a real bug, I filed this yesterday: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029241 @throws/@since are both missing (others?), it seem

Re: Code Review Request: 8025763

2013-11-27 Thread Anthony Scarpino
> On Nov 27, 2013, at 10:12 AM, Sean Mullan wrote: > >> On 11/26/2013 08:20 PM, Bradford Wetmore wrote: >> Tony, >> >> I note the @since's are missing for the new methods, both in the >> generated output in the overridden methods (i.e. no javadoc), and the >> methods in which you've changed the

Re: Code Review Request: 8025763

2013-11-27 Thread Sean Mullan
On 11/26/2013 08:20 PM, Bradford Wetmore wrote: Tony, I note the @since's are missing for the new methods, both in the generated output in the overridden methods (i.e. no javadoc), and the methods in which you've changed the behavior (i.e. new javadoc). I'm not sure what you can do about the pr

Re: Code Review Request: 8025763

2013-11-26 Thread Bradford Wetmore
Tony, I note the @since's are missing for the new methods, both in the generated output in the overridden methods (i.e. no javadoc), and the methods in which you've changed the behavior (i.e. new javadoc). I'm not sure what you can do about the previous behavior (cc'ing Mike/Sowmya, maybe th

Re: Code Review Request: 8025763

2013-10-21 Thread Sean Mullan
On 10/18/2013 10:52 PM, Anthony Scarpino wrote: I've updated the webrev http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ascarpino/8025763/webrev.01/ Update looks good. --Sean

Re: Code Review Request: 8025763

2013-10-18 Thread Anthony Scarpino
On 10/18/2013 12:44 PM, Sean Mullan wrote: Mostly looks good, just a few comments: - for completeness, please add @Override tags to all existing methods that are overridden - you need to also override the new forEach and getOrDefault methods to first check if the provider is initialized. See, f

Re: Code Review Request: 8025763

2013-10-18 Thread Sean Mullan
Mostly looks good, just a few comments: - for completeness, please add @Override tags to all existing methods that are overridden - you need to also override the new forEach and getOrDefault methods to first check if the provider is initialized. See, for example, the get method. - nit, say

Code Review Request: 8025763

2013-10-17 Thread Anthony Scarpino
Hi, I need a code review for changes regarding 8025763 Provider does not override new Hashtable methods http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ascarpino/8025763/ thanks Tony