Resending this message from the account associated with my security-dev
subscription, in the hope that this will bypass moderation:
Rory O'Donnell recommended that I bring this issue to the security
developers' mailing list. I work on Apache Derby. Derby is one of the
applications which receiv
On 15/06/2021 15:10, Rick Hillegas wrote:
:
When I tried to build Derby with the Rampdown Phase One build of open
JDK 17 (17-ea+26-2439), I saw many warnings related to the deprecation
of Security Manager classes and methods, undoubtedly the consequence
of JEP 411 (https://openjdk.java.net/je
Rick,
Out of curiosity, does Apache Derby have a need for an Authorization layer?
We have tooling to generate our policy files, which simplifies the
process a lot, we also have highly scalable and performant
SecurityManager and Policy implementations which are compatible with
standard Java po
Thanks, Peter. Derby supports a couple authorization mechanisms, the
most important one being the role-based SQL Standard GRANT/REVOKE
commands (see
https://db.apache.org/derby/docs/10.15/security/csecauthorization.html).
I'm afraid that my old eyes didn't see a link to your authorization
libr
Thanks for that advice, Alan. I have rototilled
@SuppressWarnings("removal") annotations across the Derby codebase and
thrown more memory at javadoc so that it won't crash on JDK 11. When I
run Derby's test suites, I see a blizzard of the following diagnostics:
WARNING: java.lang.System::set
Hi Rick
This is dependant on OpenJDK creating hooks in JVM code for existing
permission's without depending existing Security infrastructure.
The major components can be found here, also available on Maven:
https://github.com/pfirmstone/JGDMS/blob/trunk/JGDMS/jgdms-platform/src/main/java/net/
On 17/06/2021 00:30, Rick Hillegas wrote:
Thanks for that advice, Alan. I have rototilled
@SuppressWarnings("removal") annotations across the Derby codebase and
thrown more memory at javadoc so that it won't crash on JDK 11. When I
run Derby's test suites, I see a blizzard of the following diag
On 6/17/21 4:56 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 17/06/2021 00:30, Rick Hillegas wrote:
Thanks for that advice, Alan. I have rototilled
@SuppressWarnings("removal") annotations across the Derby codebase
and thrown more memory at javadoc so that it won't crash on JDK 11.
When I run Derby's test suite
