Thanks David for your Support.
I have been developing cryptographic algorithms in our Entrust Java toolkit
since the early 2000’s, so between us we have a lot of years of experience
using the JCA. 😊
Mike, a KEM is not a Cipher. I think of it as a kind of middle ground
between a Key Agreem
Hi Mike,
KEMs can be used for key wrapping - we've actually implemented support
for this too. But they are not actually key wrapping ciphers.
Here's a simple example of using Kyber for key wrapping in BC:
SecretKey key =new SecretKeySpec(keyBytes,"AES");
w1.init(Cipher.WRAP_MODE, kp.getPubli
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 08:40:39 GMT, Josef Eisl wrote:
>> Valerie Peng has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Updated to address review comments.
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/security/Provider.java line 1276:
>
>> 1274:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 20:33:23 GMT, Jayashree Huttanagoudar
wrote:
>> Could you please review the changes?
>> This patch is to address :
>> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8215916?jql=labels%20%3D%20starter-bug
>
> Jayashree Huttanagoudar has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>
Hi This implemented as part of Javax.crypto.Cipher. See the Java doc for the
wrap and unwrap methods.
Mike
Sent from my iPad
> On Aug 19, 2022, at 12:56, John Gray wrote:
>
> We are starting to make use of the new PQ algorithms adopted by NIST for
> prototyping and development of standa
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 20:29:18 GMT, Jayashree Huttanagoudar
wrote:
> I have included your suggestions for the test case.
> Since we are using `PrintStream` the `flush` is automatically called itseems
> so I didn't see any exception trace in the .jtr file when the test case fails.
This is because
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 20:33:23 GMT, Jayashree Huttanagoudar
wrote:
>> Could you please review the changes?
>> This patch is to address :
>> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8215916?jql=labels%20%3D%20starter-bug
>
> Jayashree Huttanagoudar has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>
On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 19:13:33 GMT, Jayashree Huttanagoudar
wrote:
>> Could you please review the changes?
>> This patch is to address :
>> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8215916?jql=labels%20%3D%20starter-bug
>
> Jayashree Huttanagoudar has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>
> Could you please review the changes?
> This patch is to address :
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8215916?jql=labels%20%3D%20starter-bug
Jayashree Huttanagoudar has updated the pull request incrementally with one
additional commit since the last revision:
Address review comments
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 19:01:10 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> Sigh. I removed the test file itself long time ago but forgot to remove a
> line on it in the problem list.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: df5209e7
Author:Weijun Wang
URL:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/comm
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 15:13:34 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> The two tests are no longer manual and should be removed from the problem
> list.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 235151ea
Author:Weijun Wang
URL:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/commit/235151ead89f9102e3a57ba
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 15:13:34 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> The two tests are no longer manual and should be removed from the problem
> list.
Marked as reviewed by hchao (Committer).
Looks good.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9943
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 18:47:40 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> The final version of the CSR at https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8290119
> uses `@implNote` for the new text, but the code change was not updated before
> the integration.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 74d3330e
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 19:01:10 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> Sigh. I removed the test file itself long time ago but forgot to remove a
> line on it in the problem list.
Marked as reviewed by hchao (Committer).
Looks good.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9951
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 18:47:40 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> The final version of the CSR at https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8290119
> uses `@implNote` for the new text, but the code change was not updated before
> the integration.
Marked as reviewed by hchao (Committer).
Looks good.
-
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 19:01:10 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> Sigh. I removed the test file itself long time ago but forgot to remove a
> line on it in the problem list.
Marked as reviewed by xuelei (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9951
Sigh. I removed the test file itself long time ago but forgot to remove a line
on it in the problem list.
-
Commit messages:
- the fix
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9951/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=9951&range=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 18:47:40 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> The final version of the CSR at https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8290119
> uses `@implNote` for the new text, but the code change was not updated before
> the integration.
Per the CSR, this is a straightforward update to me.
--
The final version of the CSR at https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8290119
uses `@implNote` for the new text, but the code change was not updated before
the integration.
-
Commit messages:
- the fix
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9949/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.ope
Add a JMH for ProtectionDomain related to current work on JDK-8292375. Also,
add the InMemoryJavaCompiler to the JMH jar, to generate the classes needed for
this test and will be useful for future class loading JMH too.
-
Commit messages:
- 8292681: Add JMH for ProtectionDomain
Ch
I'd like to just add a supporting comment on this by showing what we've
currently done.
At the moment KEM usage in the JCA is provided in the BC API by doing
the following:
// key pair generation
KeyPairGenerator kpg = KeyPairGenerator.getInstance("Kyber",
"BCPQC");
kpg.i
We are starting to make use of the new PQ algorithms adopted by NIST for
prototyping and development of standards. In particular we are working on a
composite KEM standard:
See: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ounsworth-pq-composite-kem/
However, there is no KEM interface in the JCA (
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 15:13:34 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> The two tests are no longer manual and should be removed from the problem
> list.
Marked as reviewed by xuelei (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9943
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 15:13:34 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> The two tests are no longer manual and should be removed from the problem
> list.
Looks good to me.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9943
The two tests are no longer manual and should be removed from the problem list.
-
Commit messages:
- the fix
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9943/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=9943&range=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8292676
St
On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 19:13:33 GMT, Jayashree Huttanagoudar
wrote:
>> Could you please review the changes?
>> This patch is to address :
>> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8215916?jql=labels%20%3D%20starter-bug
>
> Jayashree Huttanagoudar has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>
On Wed, 8 Dec 2021 00:18:44 GMT, Valerie Peng wrote:
>> It is observed that when running crypto benchmark with large number of
>> threads, a lot of time is spent on the synchronized block inside the
>> Provider.getService() method. The cause for this is that
>> Provider.getService() method fir
27 matches
Mail list logo
