> This update is to support key exchange named groups customization for
> individual (D)TLS connection. Please review the CSR as well:
> CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8291950
> RFE: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8281236
> Release-note: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8291975
On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 07:08:55 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Furthermore, I think in its current form it means that this will
> load/instantiate any `JdkConsoleProvider` implementations that are accessible
> to the thread context classloader but may not have been from the module
> configured
On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 19:52:59 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
>> This is to allow Console to be used even when it is not attached to the
>> platform provided terminal, such as the case when the standard input is
>> redirected. `System.console()` now returns a Console implementation based on
>>
On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 19:52:59 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
>> This is to allow Console to be used even when it is not attached to the
>> platform provided terminal, such as the case when the standard input is
>> redirected. `System.console()` now returns a Console implementation based on
>>
On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 19:52:59 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
>> This is to allow Console to be used even when it is not attached to the
>> platform provided terminal, such as the case when the standard input is
>> redirected. `System.console()` now returns a Console implementation based on
>>
On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 19:52:59 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
>> This is to allow Console to be used even when it is not attached to the
>> platform provided terminal, such as the case when the standard input is
>> redirected. `System.console()` now returns a Console implementation based on
>>
On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 19:52:59 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
>> This is to allow Console to be used even when it is not attached to the
>> platform provided terminal, such as the case when the standard input is
>> redirected. `System.console()` now returns a Console implementation based on
>>
On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 19:52:59 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
>> This is to allow Console to be used even when it is not attached to the
>> platform provided terminal, such as the case when the standard input is
>> redirected. `System.console()` now returns a Console implementation based on
>>
On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 19:52:59 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
>> This is to allow Console to be used even when it is not attached to the
>> platform provided terminal, such as the case when the standard input is
>> redirected. `System.console()` now returns a Console implementation based on
>>
On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 22:05:51 GMT, Volodymyr Paprotski wrote:
>> There is now an intrinsic for Poly1305, which is only enabled on the
>> `engineUpdate([]byte)` path. This PR adds intrinsic support
>> `engineUpdate(ByteBuffer)` (when the bytebuffer `hasArray`).
>>
>> Fuzzing test expanded to
> I would like a review of an update to the GCM code. A recent report showed
> that GCM memory usage for TLS was very large. This was a result of in-place
> buffers, which TLS uses, and how the code handled the combined intrinsic
> method during decryption. A temporary buffer was used
On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 22:05:51 GMT, Volodymyr Paprotski wrote:
>> There is now an intrinsic for Poly1305, which is only enabled on the
>> `engineUpdate([]byte)` path. This PR adds intrinsic support
>> `engineUpdate(ByteBuffer)` (when the bytebuffer `hasArray`).
>>
>> Fuzzing test expanded to
On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 18:23:45 GMT, Volodymyr Paprotski wrote:
>> There is now an intrinsic for Poly1305, which is only enabled on the
>> `engineUpdate([]byte)` path. This PR adds intrinsic support
>> `engineUpdate(ByteBuffer)` (when the bytebuffer `hasArray`).
>>
>> Fuzzing test expanded to
> There is now an intrinsic for Poly1305, which is only enabled on the
> `engineUpdate([]byte)` path. This PR adds intrinsic support
> `engineUpdate(ByteBuffer)` (when the bytebuffer `hasArray`).
>
> Fuzzing test expanded to also include ByteBuffer payloads.
>
> Performance is now matched:
>
On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 18:23:45 GMT, Volodymyr Paprotski wrote:
>> There is now an intrinsic for Poly1305, which is only enabled on the
>> `engineUpdate([]byte)` path. This PR adds intrinsic support
>> `engineUpdate(ByteBuffer)` (when the bytebuffer `hasArray`).
>>
>> Fuzzing test expanded to
On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 17:56:49 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>> Please review this test addition as it would have helped discover a
>> regression when https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8269039 got introduced
>> and subsequently backported. What's more, it might help discover similar
>> issues
On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 19:52:59 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
>> This is to allow Console to be used even when it is not attached to the
>> platform provided terminal, such as the case when the standard input is
>> redirected. `System.console()` now returns a Console implementation based on
>>
On Sun, 4 Dec 2022 17:09:15 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Naoto Sato has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Changed the expected behavior when the SecurityManager is enabled
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/Console.java
> This is to allow Console to be used even when it is not attached to the
> platform provided terminal, such as the case when the standard input is
> redirected. `System.console()` now returns a Console implementation based on
> `jdk.internal.le` terminal by default, or jshell implementation if
> This task converts 5 manual tests to automated tests.
>
> sun/security/provider/PolicyParser/ExtDirsDefaultPolicy.java
> sun/security/provider/PolicyParser/ExtDirsChange.java
> sun/security/provider/PolicyParser/ExtDirs.java
>
On Fri, 2 Dec 2022 16:40:51 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> According to [the
> specification](https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/19/docs/api/java.base/java/util/Properties.html#load(java.io.Reader))
> trailing whitespaces in the values of properties files are (somewhat
> surprisingly)
On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 18:33:10 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
>> This is to allow Console to be used even when it is not attached to the
>> platform provided terminal, such as the case when the standard input is
>> redirected. `System.console()` now returns a Console implementation based on
>>
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8293412
Mark Powers has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in
by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains eight additional commits since
the last
On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 18:22:00 GMT, Sandhya Viswanathan
wrote:
>> Volodymyr Paprotski has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> remove comment
>
> @valeriepeng Could you please take a look at this PR?
@sviswa7 I will be looking at
> This is to allow Console to be used even when it is not attached to the
> platform provided terminal, such as the case when the standard input is
> redirected. `System.console()` now returns a Console implementation based on
> `jdk.internal.le` terminal by default, or jshell implementation if
> This is to allow Console to be used even when it is not attached to the
> platform provided terminal, such as the case when the standard input is
> redirected. `System.console()` now returns a Console implementation based on
> `jdk.internal.le` terminal by default, or jshell implementation if
On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 18:23:45 GMT, Volodymyr Paprotski wrote:
>> There is now an intrinsic for Poly1305, which is only enabled on the
>> `engineUpdate([]byte)` path. This PR adds intrinsic support
>> `engineUpdate(ByteBuffer)` (when the bytebuffer `hasArray`).
>>
>> Fuzzing test expanded to
> Please review this test addition as it would have helped discover a
> regression when https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8269039 got introduced
> and subsequently backported. What's more, it might help discover similar
> issues going forward. Thoughts?
>
> Testing: Manually produced a build
> Please review this test addition as it would have helped discover a
> regression when https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8269039 got introduced
> and subsequently backported. What's more, it might help discover similar
> issues going forward. Thoughts?
>
> Testing: Manually produced a build
Please review this test addition as it would have helped discover a regression
when https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8269039 got introduced and
subsequently backported. What's more, it might help discover similar issues
going forward. Thoughts?
Testing: Manually produced a build without
On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 16:37:48 GMT, Daniel Jeliński wrote:
> This patch fixes the exceptions that may occur when merging IP address
> NameConstraints from different certificates in a chain.
>
> The included test reports 3 exceptions without the fix, passes with the fix
> applied.
>
> Tiers 1-3
31 matches
Mail list logo
