Hi all,
This PR fix some typos bugs for RISC-V, and a typo bug in test directory.
Trivial fix, no risk.
-
Commit messages:
- 8337713: RISC-V: fix typos in macroAssembler_riscv.cpp
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21368/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jd
On Sat, 20 Jul 2024 15:32:37 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
> Hi all,
> The testcase
> `test/jdk/security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/CAInterop.java#actalisauthenticationrootca`
> run Error, because the `@run` set conflicted with `/manual` and `/timeout`.
&
On Sat, 20 Jul 2024 15:32:37 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
> Hi all,
> The testcase
> `test/jdk/security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/CAInterop.java#actalisauthenticationrootca`
> run Error, because the `@run` set conflicted with `/manual` and `/timeout`.
&
On Sat, 20 Jul 2024 15:32:37 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
> Hi all,
> The testcase
> `test/jdk/security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/CAInterop.java#actalisauthenticationrootca`
> run Error, because the `@run` set conflicted with `/manual` and `/timeout`.
&
Hi all,
The testcase
`test/jdk/security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/CAInterop.java#actalisauthenticationrootca`
run Error, because the `@run` set conflicted with `/manual` and `/timeout`. I
think the `/timeout` not needed for manual test.
Only this testcase has this
On Sat, 18 May 2024 12:34:39 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
> Hi all,
> Before `CAInterop.java#globalsigne46` imtermittent
> [failure](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8332433) has been resolved,
> mark the test as intermittent.
This pull request has been closed without bein
On Sat, 18 May 2024 12:34:39 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
> Hi all,
> Before `CAInterop.java#globalsigne46` imtermittent
> [failure](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8332433) has been resolved,
> mark the test as intermittent.
Since
`test/jdk/security/infra/java/security/cert/CertP
On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 08:07:54 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This pull request contains a backport of commit
> [8e1d2b09](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/8e1d2b091c9a311d98a0b886a803fb18d4405d8a)
> from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
>
On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 08:07:54 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This pull request contains a backport of commit
> [8e1d2b09](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/8e1d2b091c9a311d98a0b886a803fb18d4405d8a)
> from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
>
On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 08:07:54 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This pull request contains a backport of commit
> [8e1d2b09](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/8e1d2b091c9a311d98a0b886a803fb18d4405d8a)
> from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
>
Hi all,
This pull request contains a backport of commit
[8e1d2b09](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/8e1d2b091c9a311d98a0b886a803fb18d4405d8a)
from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
The commit being backported was authored by Rajan Halade on 21 Jun 2024 and was
rev
On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 15:36:44 GMT, Christoph Langer wrote:
> Looks like this PR can be closed. The underlying issue has been resolved by
> the CA.
Okey.
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19694#issuecomment-2179040063
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 12:32:58 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
> Hi all,
> Test
> `security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/CAInterop.java#digicerttlsrsarootg5`
> report failure as failed to validate, before the validate issue has been
> fixed, should we problem li
On Fri, 14 Jun 2024 00:58:30 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
>> Thanks for the approved.
>
>> @sendaoYan As a best practice, it would be useful to first understand why
>> the test is not working before putting it on the ProblemList. Depending on
>> the severity of the problem
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 01:20:55 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
> Hi all,
> Test
> `security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/CAInterop.java#quovadisrootca1g3`
> report failure as `failed to validate`, before the validate issue has been
> fixed, should we p
On Sat, 18 May 2024 12:34:39 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
> Hi all,
> Before `CAInterop.java#globalsigne46` imtermittent
> [failure](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8332433) has been resolved,
> mark the test as intermittent.
Hi, can anyone take look this PR.
-
PR Co
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 12:32:58 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
> Hi all,
> Test
> `security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/CAInterop.java#digicerttlsrsarootg5`
> report failure as failed to validate, before the validate issue has been
> fixed, should we problem li
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 14:38:08 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
>> SendaoYan has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
>> commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - Merge branch 'jbs8334106' of github.com:sendaoYan/jdk-ysd into jbs8334106
>> -
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 12:21:23 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> Test
>> `security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/CAInterop.java#quovadisrootca1g3`
>> report failure as `failed to validate`, before the validate issue has been
>> fix
Hi all,
Test
`security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/CAInterop.java#digicerttlsrsarootg5`
report failure as failed to validate, before the validate issue has been
fixed, should we problem list the testcase.
-
Commit messages:
- 8333938: Exclude CAInterop
> Hi all,
> Test
> `security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/CAInterop.java#quovadisrootca1g3`
> report failure as `failed to validate`, before the validate issue has been
> fixed, should we problem list the testcase.
SendaoYan has updated t
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 09:21:41 GMT, Christoph Langer wrote:
> let's wait a bit with integration before the security folks had a chance to
> look at this...
Okey.
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19685#issuecomment-2165126505
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 01:20:55 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
> Hi all,
> Test
> `security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/CAInterop.java#quovadisrootca1g3`
> report failure as `failed to validate`, before the validate issue has been
> fixed, should we p
Hi all,
Test
`security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/CAInterop.java#quovadisrootca1g3`
report failure as `failed to validate`, before the validate issue has been
fixed, should we problem list the testcase.
-
Commit messages:
- Merge branch 'openjdk:ma
On Fri, 7 Jun 2024 07:29:39 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> This PR several extra empty spaces and extra empty lines in several
>> Makefiles. It's trivial fix, no risk.
>>
>> Thanks.
>
> SendaoYan has updated the pull request incrementally wit
On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 07:47:46 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
> Hi all,
> This PR several extra empty spaces and extra empty lines in several
> Makefiles. It's trivial fix, no risk.
>
> Thanks.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: d130d2f4
Author:SendaoYa
On Fri, 7 Jun 2024 12:53:46 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> No, it's an extra newline. A file should end with a newline but one is
>> enough.
>
> As confusing as they are, unfortunately GitHub UI does not render extra
> trailing newlines. This is the only one I could find with grepWin.
I find the ex
On Fri, 7 Jun 2024 07:29:39 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> This PR several extra empty spaces and extra empty lines in several
>> Makefiles. It's trivial fix, no risk.
>>
>> Thanks.
>
> SendaoYan has updated the pull request incrementally wit
> Hi all,
> This PR several extra empty spaces and extra empty lines in several
> Makefiles. It's trivial fix, no risk.
>
> Thanks.
SendaoYan has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
since the last revision:
delete extra empty trailing bla
On Thu, 6 Jun 2024 17:49:08 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> SendaoYan has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> delete extra empty trailing blank line in
>> test/jdk/java/rmi/reliability/benchmark/bench/
On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 07:47:46 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
> Hi all,
> This PR several extra empty spaces and extra empty lines in several
> Makefiles. It's trivial fix, no risk.
>
> Thanks.
Thanks for the review.
Thanks all for the review.
-
PR Comment: https:/
On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 07:47:46 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
> Hi all,
> This PR several extra empty spaces and extra empty lines in several
> Makefiles. It's trivial fix, no risk.
>
> Thanks.
> /label build
Thanks.
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/
Hi all,
This PR several extra empty spaces and extra empty lines in several
Makefiles. It's trivial fix, no risk.
Thanks.
-
Commit messages:
- 8333477: Delete extra empty spaces in Makefiles
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19537/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.
On Sat, 18 May 2024 12:44:52 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> Is there a related bug on the intermittent failure?
I have reportd the itermittent failure
[JDK-8332433](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8332433), and
[JDK-8316138](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8316138) is subtask of
JDK-833243
Hi all,
Before `CAInterop.java#globalsigne46` imtermittent failure has been resolved,
mark the test as intermittent.
-
Commit messages:
- 8332492: Mark CAInterop.java#globalsigne46 as intermittent
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19291/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.ope
On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 03:08:52 GMT, Fei Yang wrote:
> Looks good and trivial.
@RealFYang @jnimeh Thanks.
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17646#issuecomment-2043998825
On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 08:19:55 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
> 8325024: java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/OCSP/OCSPTimeout.java incorrect
> comment information
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 432756b6
Author:SendaoYan
Committer: Fei Yang
URL:
On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 17:48:19 GMT, Jamil Nimeh wrote:
> Looks good, but please label the JBS bug with noreg-trivial.
Done
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17646#issuecomment-1920357757
8325024: java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/OCSP/OCSPTimeout.java incorrect
comment information
-
Commit messages:
- 8325024: java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/OCSP/OCSPTimeout.java
incorrect comment information
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17646/files
Webrev: h
39 matches
Mail list logo
