On Tue, 1 Nov 2022 22:59:14 GMT, Mark Powers wrote:
> > Anyone from Oracle can help me to run Mach5 testing, just in case I missed
> > something?
>
> Do you have any specific mach5 tests in mind?
Please have tier 1 and tier2 covered. Thanks!
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pul
On Mon, 31 Oct 2022 17:33:57 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote:
> Anyone from Oracle can help me to run Mach5 testing, just in case I missed
> something?
Do you have any specific mach5 tests in mind?
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10893
On Tue, 1 Nov 2022 17:43:22 GMT, Mark Powers wrote:
>> Xue-Lei Andrew Fan has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> remove tailing whitespaces
>
> src/jdk.crypto.ec/share/classes/sun/security/ec/ECOperations.java line 588:
>
>> 58
On Fri, 28 Oct 2022 18:05:30 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> May I have this update reviewed?
>>
>> The EC point multiplication for secp256r1 could be improved for better
>> performance, by using more efficient algorithm and pre-computation.
>> Improvement for other curves are si
On Mon, 31 Oct 2022 20:29:23 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
> Can you please wait a few days on integrating this? I would like @ferakocz
> and/or @mcpowers to also look at this.
Sure. I'd appreciate if the review could be done by the end of this week.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/p
On Fri, 28 Oct 2022 18:05:30 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> May I have this update reviewed?
>>
>> The EC point multiplication for secp256r1 could be improved for better
>> performance, by using more efficient algorithm and pre-computation.
>> Improvement for other curves are si
On Fri, 28 Oct 2022 18:05:30 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> May I have this update reviewed?
>>
>> The EC point multiplication for secp256r1 could be improved for better
>> performance, by using more efficient algorithm and pre-computation.
>> Improvement for other curves are si
On Fri, 28 Oct 2022 18:05:30 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> May I have this update reviewed?
>>
>> The EC point multiplication for secp256r1 could be improved for better
>> performance, by using more efficient algorithm and pre-computation.
>> Improvement for other curves are si
On Fri, 28 Oct 2022 18:05:30 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> May I have this update reviewed?
>>
>> The EC point multiplication for secp256r1 could be improved for better
>> performance, by using more efficient algorithm and pre-computation.
>> Improvement for other curves are si
On Mon, 31 Oct 2022 07:08:54 GMT, Daniel Jeliński wrote:
> It would be nice to add a test / consistency check, verifying that:
The current tests could be used to verify the tables. As the fields are
private, it is not easy to add a test. But I will try in the follow-up change
that hardcodes
On Fri, 28 Oct 2022 18:05:30 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> May I have this update reviewed?
>>
>> The EC point multiplication for secp256r1 could be improved for better
>> performance, by using more efficient algorithm and pre-computation.
>> Improvement for other curves are si
On Fri, 28 Oct 2022 14:39:34 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote:
>> src/jdk.crypto.ec/share/classes/sun/security/ec/ECOperations.java line 628:
>>
>>> 626: ProjectivePoint.Mutable m =
>>> 627: multiplier.pointMultiply(s);
>>> 628:
> Hi,
>
> May I have this update reviewed?
>
> The EC point multiplication for secp256r1 could be improved for better
> performance, by using more efficient algorithm and pre-computation.
> Improvement for other curves are similar, but will be addressed in separated
> PRs.
>
> The basic idea
13 matches
Mail list logo
