--On 8/7/09 4:41 PM -0700 Scott Rotondo sent:
> Glenn Faden wrote:
>> Aric Gregson wrote:
>>> On 8/7/09 2:18 PM, Glenn Faden wrote:
Please verify that Primary Administrator is still
/etc/security/prof_attr.
>>> Actually, no. Why not??
>> Good question. I suspect it is related to the new
Glenn Faden wrote:
> Aric Gregson wrote:
>> On 8/7/09 2:18 PM, Glenn Faden wrote:
>>> Please verify that Primary Administrator is still
>>> /etc/security/prof_attr.
>> Actually, no. Why not??
> Good question. I suspect it is related to the new SMF service,
> svc:/system/rbac. This is supposed to
On 8/7/09 4:23 PM, Glenn Faden wrote:
> Aric Gregson wrote:
>> On 8/7/09 3:20 PM, Glenn Faden wrote:
>>> Aric Gregson wrote:
On 8/7/09 2:18 PM, Glenn Faden wrote:
> Please verify that Primary Administrator is still
> /etc/security/prof_attr.
Actually, no. Why not??
>>> Good ques
Aric Gregson wrote:
> On 8/7/09 3:20 PM, Glenn Faden wrote:
>> Aric Gregson wrote:
>>> On 8/7/09 2:18 PM, Glenn Faden wrote:
Please verify that Primary Administrator is still
/etc/security/prof_attr.
>>> Actually, no. Why not??
>> Good question. I suspect it is related to the new SMF se
On 8/7/09 3:52 PM, Scott Rotondo wrote:
> In the meantime, you can fix this problem by putting back the line
> that used to be there:
>
>> % cat /etc/security/exec_attr | grep "Primary"
>> Primary Administrator:suser:cmd:::*:uid=0;gid=0
>
> Make sure there is a Primary Administrator line in
> /et
Aric Gregson wrote:
> On 8/7/09 1:56 PM, Valerie Bubb Fenwick wrote:
>>
>> what do you see when this fails? can you show us an actual
>> example of trying to run "pfexec "?
> Examples include:
>
> % pfexec gedit /var/share/lxde/openbox/menu.xml -> cannot save changes
> on file
> -rw-r--r-- 1 ro
On 8/7/09 3:20 PM, Glenn Faden wrote:
> Aric Gregson wrote:
>> On 8/7/09 2:18 PM, Glenn Faden wrote:
>>> Please verify that Primary Administrator is still
>>> /etc/security/prof_attr.
>> Actually, no. Why not??
> Good question. I suspect it is related to the new SMF service,
> svc:/system/rbac.
On 8/7/09 1:56 PM, Valerie Bubb Fenwick wrote:
>
> what do you see when this fails? can you show us an actual
> example of trying to run "pfexec "?
Examples include:
% pfexec gedit /var/share/lxde/openbox/menu.xml -> cannot save changes
on file
-rw-r--r-- 1 root bin 3.2K Aug 4 11:4
Aric Gregson wrote:
> On 8/7/09 2:18 PM, Glenn Faden wrote:
>> Please verify that Primary Administrator is still
>> /etc/security/prof_attr.
> Actually, no. Why not??
Good question. I suspect it is related to the new SMF service,
svc:/system/rbac. This is supposed to merge existing entries with
On 8/7/09 2:18 PM, Glenn Faden wrote:
> Please verify that Primary Administrator is still
> /etc/security/prof_attr.
Actually, no. Why not??
aric wrote:
> I am wondering if there is a bug?
>
> % cat /etc/security/exec_attr | grep "Primary"
> Primary Administrator:suser:cmd:::*:uid=0;gid=0
>
> # usermod -P'Primary Administrator' mylogin
> UX: usermod: ERROR: Primary Administrator is not a valid profile name.
> Choose another.
>
> % id
HI Aric -
what do you see when this fails? can you show us an actual
example of trying to run "pfexec "?
I thought I had a problem with profiles on my machine, but it
turns out I was trying to pfexec from a directory that was only
readable by me (not the super user), which caused problems for
the
I am wondering if there is a bug?
% cat /etc/security/exec_attr | grep "Primary"
Primary Administrator:suser:cmd:::*:uid=0;gid=0
# usermod -P'Primary Administrator' mylogin
UX: usermod: ERROR: Primary Administrator is not a valid profile name. Choose
another.
% id -a
uid=100(mylogin) gid=100(m
Hello,
I have been using the rights profile of 'Primary Administrator' for some time
now so that I can use pfexec appropriately, like root. After the last upgrade
from snv_109->114 I found that I had to install SUNWwbcor to get the Primary
Administrator back. However, after the snv_117 upgrade
14 matches
Mail list logo
