On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Grant Grundler wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 5:08 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 8:28 PM, Grant Grundler
>> wrote:
>>> Ping? Any feedback on this patch?
>>
>> It's on my
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 8:28 PM, Grant Grundler wrote:
> Ping? Any feedback on this patch?
It's on my list of patches to review, patience please.
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
>>
>> 'perms' will never be NULL since it
[resending as plain text only - sorry]
Ping? Any feedback on this patch?
LGTM.
cheers,
grant
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> 'perms' will never be NULL since it isn't a plain pointer but an array
> of u32 values.
>
> This fixes the following
Ping? Any feedback on this patch?
LGTM.
cheers,
grant
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> 'perms' will never be NULL since it isn't a plain pointer but an array
> of u32 values.
>
> This fixes the following warning when building with clang:
>
>
'perms' will never be NULL since it isn't a plain pointer but an array
of u32 values.
This fixes the following warning when building with clang:
security/selinux/ss/services.c:158:16: error: address of array
'p_in->perms' will always evaluate to 'true'
[-Werror,-Wpointer-bool-conversion]