[SMW-devel] SMW, Halo and "SMW+" [Re: Halo Installation - help]

[Resending similar mail after bounce, apologies for those who got duplicates. This is a follow-up to some prior discussion on installation problems with the Halo extension.] On Dienstag, 3. Juni 2008, Markus Nitsche wrote: > Hi Alex, > > > > the file you are probably looking for is >

[SMW-devel] SMW registration temporarily unavailable

The SMW registration service [1] is temporarily unavailable due to firewall configuration issues. We will fix the problem within the next two weeks. Cheers, Markus [1] http://semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:SMWRegistry -- Markus Krötzsch Semantic MediaWikihttp://semantic-mediawiki.org

Re: [SMW-devel] SMW, Halo and "SMW+" [Re: Halo Installation - help]

On Mittwoch, 4. Juni 2008, Markus Krötzsch wrote: > I think it is fair to warn our users of the > possibility of this fork, since switching to Halo then may have > consequences for future software upgrades (you may end up being in either > the SMW or in the Halo branch). Of course SMW has no desi

Re: [SMW-devel] Cannot disable further results link

CNIT пишет: > Hi! > After upgrading to 1.12 I've found that problem with format=embedded > and further results link didn't disappear (no wonder). > So, I've looked through the code and found a simple fix. It seems that > searchlabel was applied not checking it's empty value, > which _should_ mean

[SMW-devel] Release preview and SVN warning

As we plan to release SMW 1.2 in the next weeks, it is time for me to provide a preview of intended new features. == New Store == As a major change, there will be a new storage backend implementation with completely new internals. From a user viewpoint this means: * most operations, especially

[SMW-devel] SMW inverse properties

Hi everyone Myself and a number of other MW enthusiasts host a couple of MW-based sites that make use of SMW. A problem I came across when working with semantic relations was the lack of inverse properties, a way to define a name for an opposite relation (A *is part of* B, therefore, B *contains