If Wikipedia will only have the data but no query (because it's a burden
for its servers), then maybe there should be software on the client to
download the raw data and process the query locally. In some browsers,
even javascript is fast enough for this, so that the browser can fill in
the sec
> If Wikipedia will only have the data but no query (because it's a burden
for its servers), then maybe there should be software on the client to
download the raw data and process the query locally. In some browsers, even
javascript is fast enough for this, so that the browser can fill in the
secti
Okay, wow. :) Indeed, there's no way to do this kind of querying (to the
extent that I can even understand it) using regular SMW. But, in lieu of
writing a lot of new code: have you considered accessing the SMW data as
RDF? There are a whole set of tools for doing complex queries on RDF data,
and t
> How would they want to achieve that? Does SMW currently have some kind of
"miser mode" similar to MW's miser mode?
SMW does currently not have the ability to have only the storage
infrastructure. Markus is planning on making it modular in a way that this
will be possible though. The main reason f
22.04.2010 18:04, Jeroen De Dauw пишет:
> Hey,
>
> > How likely will Wikipedia adopt SMW some time in the future?
> This won't be any time soon. There is some effort going on to get a
> stripped down version of SMW that does not have query capabilities
> onto commons though. Getting SMW on other
