Re: [SMW-devel] No version number for Semantic Result Formats

2008-10-22 Thread Nathan Yergler
If any testing is going to occur between SMW and SRF I think it'd be useful to adopt the X.X.1 numbering scheme you describe. That would at least partially decouple srf releases from smw releases while still indicating compatibility. On Oct 22, 2008 6:32 AM, "Denny Vrandečić" <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [SMW-devel] No version number for Semantic Result Formats

2008-10-22 Thread Denny Vrandečić
I just discussed this idea with Yaron, and he thinks that it may be not so good an idea to synch the version numbers. So the idea was to have a release out after every SMW release, which would use the same number as the SMW release. In-between releases of SRF would have the numbering scheme X.X.1,

Re: [SMW-devel] No version number for Semantic Result Formats

2008-10-22 Thread Denny Vrandečić
Not by design, it just has not been added yet. The plan is to release a version 1.4 shortly after or together with SMW 1.4 as a first version. So the current version would be a 1.4beta I guess. Best, denny Yaron Koren wrote: > Hi, > > I see that the Semantic Result Formats extension has no versi

[SMW-devel] No version number for Semantic Result Formats

2008-10-20 Thread Yaron Koren
Hi, I see that the Semantic Result Formats extension has no version number, and doesn't show up in the 'Special:Version' page. Is that by design, or has all that just not been added yet? -Yaron - This SF.Net email is sponsore