Re: [SMW-devel] RFC Subobjects: Naming

2011-10-30 Thread Dan Bolser
I can think of lots of options too... multi value property (I know) composite property virtual page internal page internal object (I know) Ultimately, I think "subobject" and "has subobject" win in my head because of precedence. I don't think 'object' is too far from the truth here, in so far as

Re: [SMW-devel] RFC Subobjects: Naming

2011-10-30 Thread Markus Krötzsch
Here is another aggregated reply, this time about the naming. I agree that #subobject is not ideal. I agree that "object" has technical connotations, but not that they are necessarily related to anything specific; it's just a very general term that has all kinds of meanings in all kinds of area